Teovanović, Predrag

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0003-3477-6723
  • Teovanović, Predrag (31)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study

Lazarević, L.B.; Knežević, G.; Purić, D.; Teovanović, Predrag; Petrović, M.B.; Ninković, M.; Živanović, M.; Stanković, S.; Branković, M.; Lukić, P.; Opačić, G.; Žeželj, I.

(Nature Research, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, L.B.
AU  - Knežević, G.
AU  - Purić, D.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Petrović, M.B.
AU  - Ninković, M.
AU  - Živanović, M.
AU  - Stanković, S.
AU  - Branković, M.
AU  - Lukić, P.
AU  - Opačić, G.
AU  - Žeželj, I.
PY  - 2023
UR  - C:\Users\FASPER\Zotero\storage\9MVHRIYQ\display.html
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5289
AB  - People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and suffer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (different unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study offers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots. © 2023, Springer Nature Limited.
PB  - Nature Research
T2  - Scientific Reports
T2  - Scientific Reports
T2  - Scientific Reports
T1  - Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study
IS  - 1
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lazarević, L.B. and Knežević, G. and Purić, D. and Teovanović, Predrag and Petrović, M.B. and Ninković, M. and Živanović, M. and Stanković, S. and Branković, M. and Lukić, P. and Opačić, G. and Žeželj, I.",
year = "2023",
abstract = "People resort to various questionable health practices to preserve or regain health - they intentionally do not adhere to medical recommendations (e.g. self-medicate or modify the prescribed therapies; iNAR), or use traditional/complementary/alternative (TCAM) medicine. As retrospective reports overestimate adherence and suffer from recall and desirability bias, we tracked the variations in daily questionable health behaviors and compared them to their retrospectively reported lifetime use. We also preregistered and explored their relations to a wide set of psychological predictors - distal (personality traits and basic thinking dispositions) and proximal (different unfounded beliefs and biases grouped under the term irrational mindset). A community sample (N = 224) tracked daily engagement in iNAR and TCAM use for 14 days, resulting in 3136 data points. We observed a high rate of questionable health practices over the 14 days; daily engagement rates roughly corresponded to lifetime ones. Both iNAR and TCAM were weakly, but robustly positively related. Independent of the assessment method, an irrational mindset was the most important predictor of TCAM use. For iNAR, however, psychological predictors emerged as relevant only when assessed retrospectively. Our study offers insight into questionable health behaviors from both a within and between-person perspective and highlights the importance of their psychological roots. © 2023, Springer Nature Limited.",
publisher = "Nature Research",
journal = "Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports, Scientific Reports",
title = "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study",
number = "1",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w"
}
Lazarević, L.B., Knežević, G., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Petrović, M.B., Ninković, M., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Branković, M., Lukić, P., Opačić, G.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports
Nature Research., 13(1).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w
Lazarević L, Knežević G, Purić D, Teovanović P, Petrović M, Ninković M, Živanović M, Stanković S, Branković M, Lukić P, Opačić G, Žeželj I. Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study. in Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1).
doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w .
Lazarević, L.B., Knežević, G., Purić, D., Teovanović, Predrag, Petrović, M.B., Ninković, M., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Branković, M., Lukić, P., Opačić, G., Žeželj, I., "Tracking variations in daily questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: a preregistered experience sampling study" in Scientific Reports, 13, no. 1 (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41243-w . .
9

The relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing, and autistic traits in primary school children

Janković-Nikolić, Marina; Glumbić, Nenad; Mentus-Kandić, Tatjana; Teovanović, Predrag

(Društvo psihologa Srbije, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Janković-Nikolić, Marina
AU  - Glumbić, Nenad
AU  - Mentus-Kandić, Tatjana
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5286
AB  - The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing,
and autistic traits in primary school children. The sample included 353 primary school children
aged 7-11 years. The children’s versions of the Empathy Quotient – EQ-C, Systemizing
Quotient – SQ-C, and children’s version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient - AQ– C were
used as primary outcome measures. Girls had higher empathy, while boys had higher autistic
traits. Empathy and systemizing were moderately positively correlated, but both were good
predictors of autistic traits. The effect of sex on autistic traits was mediated by empathy as
well as by the difference between systemizing and empathy. These results partially support
assumptions of the Empathizing-Systemizing theory and the Hypersystemizing theory of
autism, which should be further evaluated in a population with the autism spectrum disorder
AB  - Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je da ispita povezanost između pola, empatije, sistematizovanja i autističnih crta kod dece osnovnoškolskog uzrasta. Uzorak je činilo 353 učenika osnovne škole, starosti 7-11 godina. U istraživanju su korišćene dečije verzije Koefcijenta empatičnosti (eng. Empathy Quotient – EQ-C), Koeficijenta sistematizacije (eng. Systemizing Quotient – SQ-C), kao i dečija verzija Koeficijenta autističnog spektra (eng. Autism Spectrum Quotient – AQ-C), kao primarne mere ishoda. Devojčice su imale višu empatiju, dok su dečaci imali izraženije autistične crte. Empatija i sistematizacija su bili u umerenoj pozitivnoj korelaciji, ali su oba bili dobri prediktori autističnih crta. Uticaj pola na autistične crte posredovan je empatijom i razlikom između sistematizacije i empatije. Ovi rezultati delimično podržavaju postavke teorije empatičnosti-sistematizacije i hipersistematizacione teorije autizma, koje bi trebalo dalje proveriti i na populaciji osoba sa poremećajem iz spektra autizma. Ključne reči: empatisanje, sistematizovanje, teorija hipersistematizacije, autizam
PB  - Društvo psihologa Srbije
T2  - Psihologija
T1  - The relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing, and autistic traits in primary school children
T1  - Odnos pola, empatije, sistematizovanja i  autističnih crta kod dece osnovnoškolskog uzrasta
EP  - 19
SP  - 1
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211113023J
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Janković-Nikolić, Marina and Glumbić, Nenad and Mentus-Kandić, Tatjana and Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2023",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing,
and autistic traits in primary school children. The sample included 353 primary school children
aged 7-11 years. The children’s versions of the Empathy Quotient – EQ-C, Systemizing
Quotient – SQ-C, and children’s version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient - AQ– C were
used as primary outcome measures. Girls had higher empathy, while boys had higher autistic
traits. Empathy and systemizing were moderately positively correlated, but both were good
predictors of autistic traits. The effect of sex on autistic traits was mediated by empathy as
well as by the difference between systemizing and empathy. These results partially support
assumptions of the Empathizing-Systemizing theory and the Hypersystemizing theory of
autism, which should be further evaluated in a population with the autism spectrum disorder, Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je da ispita povezanost između pola, empatije, sistematizovanja i autističnih crta kod dece osnovnoškolskog uzrasta. Uzorak je činilo 353 učenika osnovne škole, starosti 7-11 godina. U istraživanju su korišćene dečije verzije Koefcijenta empatičnosti (eng. Empathy Quotient – EQ-C), Koeficijenta sistematizacije (eng. Systemizing Quotient – SQ-C), kao i dečija verzija Koeficijenta autističnog spektra (eng. Autism Spectrum Quotient – AQ-C), kao primarne mere ishoda. Devojčice su imale višu empatiju, dok su dečaci imali izraženije autistične crte. Empatija i sistematizacija su bili u umerenoj pozitivnoj korelaciji, ali su oba bili dobri prediktori autističnih crta. Uticaj pola na autistične crte posredovan je empatijom i razlikom između sistematizacije i empatije. Ovi rezultati delimično podržavaju postavke teorije empatičnosti-sistematizacije i hipersistematizacione teorije autizma, koje bi trebalo dalje proveriti i na populaciji osoba sa poremećajem iz spektra autizma. Ključne reči: empatisanje, sistematizovanje, teorija hipersistematizacije, autizam",
publisher = "Društvo psihologa Srbije",
journal = "Psihologija",
title = "The relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing, and autistic traits in primary school children, Odnos pola, empatije, sistematizovanja i  autističnih crta kod dece osnovnoškolskog uzrasta",
pages = "19-1",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211113023J"
}
Janković-Nikolić, M., Glumbić, N., Mentus-Kandić, T.,& Teovanović, P.. (2023). The relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing, and autistic traits in primary school children. in Psihologija
Društvo psihologa Srbije., 1-19.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211113023J
Janković-Nikolić M, Glumbić N, Mentus-Kandić T, Teovanović P. The relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing, and autistic traits in primary school children. in Psihologija. 2023;:1-19.
doi:https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211113023J .
Janković-Nikolić, Marina, Glumbić, Nenad, Mentus-Kandić, Tatjana, Teovanović, Predrag, "The relationship between sex, empathy, systemizing, and autistic traits in primary school children" in Psihologija (2023):1-19,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211113023J . .

Карактеристике игровних интеракција близанаца са поремећајем из спектра аутизма

Đorđević, Mirjana; Vukotić, Tamara; Glumbić, Nenad; Teovanović, Predrag; Golubović, Špela

(Institut za pedagoska istrazivanja, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Mirjana
AU  - Vukotić, Tamara
AU  - Glumbić, Nenad
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Golubović, Špela
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5186
AB  - Игра је природно стање у коме деца уживају, али и вежбају различите когнитивне,

друштвене и моторичке вештине. Посматрање игре у природном окружењу за учење по-
маже практичарима и истраживачима да развију прикладне интервенције. Досадашња

истраживања заснована на запажањима у природном окружењу за учење указују на ве-
лики јаз између понашања деце са аутизмом и њихових вршњака. Иако се аутизам рела-
тивно често јавља код близанаца, нема много истраживања која се баве њиховим игров-
ним интеракцијама. Циљ овог истраживања био је да се утврди доминантан тип игре и

интеракције код три пара близанаца код којих је дијагностикован поремећај из спектра
аутизма у свакодневном школском окружењу, дужину трајања интеракција, најчешће покретаче интеракција и постојање разлика у њиховом трајању у зависности од тога ка
коме су биле усмерене. У овом истраживању учествовало је шест дечака са аутизмом,
односно три пара близанаца. Подаци су прикупљени коришћењем упитника (The general
questionnaire; ZQYT; GARS-3), као и путем опсервација (The Social Interaction Coding
Protocol). Понашање и интеракције близанаца снимљени су видео-камером. Резултати су
показали да су близанци најчешће учествовали у манипулативној и репетитивној игри,

нешто ређе у релационој, док у симболичкој игри нису учествовали. Није било статистич-
ки значајне разлике у трајању интеракција када је иницијатор био близанац у односу на

оне које је започело друго дете, док су интеракције које је иницирао наставник трајале

значајно дуже. Близанци су најмање комуницирали са својим близаначким паром. До-
датно, резултати истраживања су показали да је једноставно друштвено усмерено пона-
шање најчешћи тип интеракције, а затим координисано друштвено усмерено понашање.

На основу добијених резултата можемо закључити да близанци са аутизмом најчешће

учествују у два типа игре, као и да интеракције које остварују различито трају у завис-
ности од тога да ли је иницијатор дете или одрасла особа. Игра деце са аутизмом заузи-
ма значајно место у образовном контексту. Стога су подаци добијени посматрањем игре

близанаца са аутизмом значајни за практичаре у циљу процене како се карактеристике
постојеће игре могу искористити за планирање интервенција којима ће се унапредити
социјалне интеракције деце са аутизмом.
PB  - Institut za pedagoska istrazivanja
T2  - Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања
T1  - Карактеристике игровних интеракција близанаца са поремећајем из спектра аутизма
EP  - 234
IS  - 1
SP  - 211
VL  - 55
DO  - 10.2298/ZIPI2301211D
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Đorđević, Mirjana and Vukotić, Tamara and Glumbić, Nenad and Teovanović, Predrag and Golubović, Špela",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Игра је природно стање у коме деца уживају, али и вежбају различите когнитивне,

друштвене и моторичке вештине. Посматрање игре у природном окружењу за учење по-
маже практичарима и истраживачима да развију прикладне интервенције. Досадашња

истраживања заснована на запажањима у природном окружењу за учење указују на ве-
лики јаз између понашања деце са аутизмом и њихових вршњака. Иако се аутизам рела-
тивно често јавља код близанаца, нема много истраживања која се баве њиховим игров-
ним интеракцијама. Циљ овог истраживања био је да се утврди доминантан тип игре и

интеракције код три пара близанаца код којих је дијагностикован поремећај из спектра
аутизма у свакодневном школском окружењу, дужину трајања интеракција, најчешће покретаче интеракција и постојање разлика у њиховом трајању у зависности од тога ка
коме су биле усмерене. У овом истраживању учествовало је шест дечака са аутизмом,
односно три пара близанаца. Подаци су прикупљени коришћењем упитника (The general
questionnaire; ZQYT; GARS-3), као и путем опсервација (The Social Interaction Coding
Protocol). Понашање и интеракције близанаца снимљени су видео-камером. Резултати су
показали да су близанци најчешће учествовали у манипулативној и репетитивној игри,

нешто ређе у релационој, док у симболичкој игри нису учествовали. Није било статистич-
ки значајне разлике у трајању интеракција када је иницијатор био близанац у односу на

оне које је започело друго дете, док су интеракције које је иницирао наставник трајале

значајно дуже. Близанци су најмање комуницирали са својим близаначким паром. До-
датно, резултати истраживања су показали да је једноставно друштвено усмерено пона-
шање најчешћи тип интеракције, а затим координисано друштвено усмерено понашање.

На основу добијених резултата можемо закључити да близанци са аутизмом најчешће

учествују у два типа игре, као и да интеракције које остварују различито трају у завис-
ности од тога да ли је иницијатор дете или одрасла особа. Игра деце са аутизмом заузи-
ма значајно место у образовном контексту. Стога су подаци добијени посматрањем игре

близанаца са аутизмом значајни за практичаре у циљу процене како се карактеристике
постојеће игре могу искористити за планирање интервенција којима ће се унапредити
социјалне интеракције деце са аутизмом.",
publisher = "Institut za pedagoska istrazivanja",
journal = "Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања",
title = "Карактеристике игровних интеракција близанаца са поремећајем из спектра аутизма",
pages = "234-211",
number = "1",
volume = "55",
doi = "10.2298/ZIPI2301211D"
}
Đorđević, M., Vukotić, T., Glumbić, N., Teovanović, P.,& Golubović, Š.. (2023). Карактеристике игровних интеракција близанаца са поремећајем из спектра аутизма. in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања
Institut za pedagoska istrazivanja., 55(1), 211-234.
https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2301211D
Đorđević M, Vukotić T, Glumbić N, Teovanović P, Golubović Š. Карактеристике игровних интеракција близанаца са поремећајем из спектра аутизма. in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања. 2023;55(1):211-234.
doi:10.2298/ZIPI2301211D .
Đorđević, Mirjana, Vukotić, Tamara, Glumbić, Nenad, Teovanović, Predrag, Golubović, Špela, "Карактеристике игровних интеракција близанаца са поремећајем из спектра аутизма" in Зборник Института за педагошка истраживања, 55, no. 1 (2023):211-234,
https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2301211D . .

Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Teovanović, Predrag; Lukić, Petar; Zupan, Zorana; Lazić, Aleksandra; Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acp.3770
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3787
AB  - In the coronavirus “infodemic,” people are exposed to official recommendations but also to potentially dangerous pseudoscientific advice claimed to protect against COVID-19. We examined whether irrational beliefs predict adherence to COVID-19 guidelines as well as susceptibility to such misinformation. Irrational beliefs were indexed by belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, COVID-19 knowledge overestimation, type I error cognitive biases, and cognitive intuition. Participants (N = 407) reported (1) how often they followed guidelines (e.g., handwashing, physical distancing), (2) how often they engaged in pseudoscientific practices (e.g., consuming garlic, colloidal silver), and (3) their intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Conspiratorial beliefs predicted all three outcomes in line with our expectations. Cognitive intuition and knowledge overestimation predicted lesser adherence to guidelines, while cognitive biases predicted greater adherence, but also greater use of pseudoscientific practices. Our results suggest an important relation between irrational beliefs and health behaviors, with conspiracy theories being the most detrimental.
T2  - Applied Cognitive Psychology
T1  - Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic
EP  - 496
IS  - 2
SP  - 486
VL  - 35
DO  - 10.1002/acp.3770
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Lazić, Aleksandra and Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In the coronavirus “infodemic,” people are exposed to official recommendations but also to potentially dangerous pseudoscientific advice claimed to protect against COVID-19. We examined whether irrational beliefs predict adherence to COVID-19 guidelines as well as susceptibility to such misinformation. Irrational beliefs were indexed by belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, COVID-19 knowledge overestimation, type I error cognitive biases, and cognitive intuition. Participants (N = 407) reported (1) how often they followed guidelines (e.g., handwashing, physical distancing), (2) how often they engaged in pseudoscientific practices (e.g., consuming garlic, colloidal silver), and (3) their intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Conspiratorial beliefs predicted all three outcomes in line with our expectations. Cognitive intuition and knowledge overestimation predicted lesser adherence to guidelines, while cognitive biases predicted greater adherence, but also greater use of pseudoscientific practices. Our results suggest an important relation between irrational beliefs and health behaviors, with conspiracy theories being the most detrimental.",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
title = "Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic",
pages = "496-486",
number = "2",
volume = "35",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3770"
}
Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Lazić, A., Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. in Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 486-496.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770
Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Lazić A, Ninković M, Žeželj I. Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. in Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2021;35(2):486-496.
doi:10.1002/acp.3770 .
Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Lazić, Aleksandra, Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic" in Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, no. 2 (2021):486-496,
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770 . .
82
119
28
102

What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality

Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Purić, Danka; Teovanović, Predrag; Lukić, Petar; Zupan, Zorana; Knežević, Goran

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692100146X
UR  - C:\Users\FASPER\Zotero\storage\CJP3LC96\Lazarević et al. - 2021 - What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our healt.pdf
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3744
AB  - The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality
SP  - 110771
VL  - 176
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality",
pages = "110771",
volume = "176",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771"
}
Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z.,& Knežević, G.. (2021). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 176, 110771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
Lazarević LB, Purić D, Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Knežević G. What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;176:110771.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 .
Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Knežević, Goran, "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality" in Personality and Individual Differences, 176 (2021):110771,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 . .
6
44
10
40

What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality

Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Purić, Danka; Teovanović, Predrag; Lukić, Petar; Zupan, Zorana; Knežević, Goran

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1308
AB  - The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality
SP  - 110771
VL  - 176
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality",
pages = "110771",
volume = "176",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771"
}
Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z.,& Knežević, G.. (2021). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 176, 110771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
Lazarević LB, Purić D, Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Knežević G. What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;176:110771.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 .
Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Knežević, Goran, "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality" in Personality and Individual Differences, 176 (2021):110771,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 . .
6
44
10
40

One Hundred and Sixty-One Days in the Life of the Homopandemicus in Serbia: The Contribution of Information Credibility and Alertness in Predicting Engagement in Protective Behaviors

Lep, Žan; Ilić, Sandra; Teovanović, Predrag; Hacin Beyazoglu, Kaja; Damnjanović, Kaja

(Frontiers Media S.A., 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lep, Žan
AU  - Ilić, Sandra
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Hacin Beyazoglu, Kaja
AU  - Damnjanović, Kaja
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3501
AB  - COVID-19 pandemic is a long-lasting process associated with dynamic changes within society and in individual psychological responses. Effective communication of measures by credible sources throughout the epidemic is one of the crucial factors for the containment of the disease, and the official communication about pandemics is straightforwardly directed toward changes in behavior via engagement in (self-)protective measures. Calls for the adherence to these measures are aimed at the general population, but people's reactions to these calls vary depending on, for example, their individual differences in cognitive and emotional responses to the situation. The focus of our study was the general narrative about the epidemic as conveyed by both state officials and media outlets in times of decreased social contacts due to the quarantine, in which relying on these sources of information is even more pivotal. Our aim was to explore the stability of the proposed mediational model during the course of the epidemic in Serbia. In the model, we tested the relationship between perceived credibility of information (PCI) and two types of protective behavior—the actual self-protective behavior (ASPB) and the hypothetical protective behavior (HPB), as well as the potential mediating role of alertness in these relationships time-wise. A cross-sectional study (N = 10,782, female = 79.1%) was being administered daily during the first epidemic wave and in three more 2-week time frames during the second wave. Based on the variability of these measures during the first epidemic wave, three stages of psychological responses were mapped (acute, adaptation, and relaxation stage), which were observed, with some deviations, also in the second wave. The mediational model was relatively robust after the initial few weeks, but the strength of pairwise relationships was more changeable. With both types of protective behaviors, the predictive power of PCI was partially mediated through alertness. This suggests that, while individual differences in cognitive and affective responses are important, so is coherent, focused, and credible communication in all stages of the epidemic, which emphasizes the communality aspect of the social containment of the infection. Our findings can thus be valuable in informing the planning of effective future communication.
PB  - Frontiers Media S.A.
T2  - Frontiers in Psychology
T1  - One Hundred and Sixty-One Days in the Life of the Homopandemicus in Serbia: The Contribution of Information Credibility and Alertness in Predicting Engagement in Protective Behaviors
SP  - 631791
VL  - 12
DO  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631791
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lep, Žan and Ilić, Sandra and Teovanović, Predrag and Hacin Beyazoglu, Kaja and Damnjanović, Kaja",
year = "2021",
abstract = "COVID-19 pandemic is a long-lasting process associated with dynamic changes within society and in individual psychological responses. Effective communication of measures by credible sources throughout the epidemic is one of the crucial factors for the containment of the disease, and the official communication about pandemics is straightforwardly directed toward changes in behavior via engagement in (self-)protective measures. Calls for the adherence to these measures are aimed at the general population, but people's reactions to these calls vary depending on, for example, their individual differences in cognitive and emotional responses to the situation. The focus of our study was the general narrative about the epidemic as conveyed by both state officials and media outlets in times of decreased social contacts due to the quarantine, in which relying on these sources of information is even more pivotal. Our aim was to explore the stability of the proposed mediational model during the course of the epidemic in Serbia. In the model, we tested the relationship between perceived credibility of information (PCI) and two types of protective behavior—the actual self-protective behavior (ASPB) and the hypothetical protective behavior (HPB), as well as the potential mediating role of alertness in these relationships time-wise. A cross-sectional study (N = 10,782, female = 79.1%) was being administered daily during the first epidemic wave and in three more 2-week time frames during the second wave. Based on the variability of these measures during the first epidemic wave, three stages of psychological responses were mapped (acute, adaptation, and relaxation stage), which were observed, with some deviations, also in the second wave. The mediational model was relatively robust after the initial few weeks, but the strength of pairwise relationships was more changeable. With both types of protective behaviors, the predictive power of PCI was partially mediated through alertness. This suggests that, while individual differences in cognitive and affective responses are important, so is coherent, focused, and credible communication in all stages of the epidemic, which emphasizes the communality aspect of the social containment of the infection. Our findings can thus be valuable in informing the planning of effective future communication.",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
title = "One Hundred and Sixty-One Days in the Life of the Homopandemicus in Serbia: The Contribution of Information Credibility and Alertness in Predicting Engagement in Protective Behaviors",
pages = "631791",
volume = "12",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631791"
}
Lep, Ž., Ilić, S., Teovanović, P., Hacin Beyazoglu, K.,& Damnjanović, K.. (2021). One Hundred and Sixty-One Days in the Life of the Homopandemicus in Serbia: The Contribution of Information Credibility and Alertness in Predicting Engagement in Protective Behaviors. in Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers Media S.A.., 12, 631791.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631791
Lep Ž, Ilić S, Teovanović P, Hacin Beyazoglu K, Damnjanović K. One Hundred and Sixty-One Days in the Life of the Homopandemicus in Serbia: The Contribution of Information Credibility and Alertness in Predicting Engagement in Protective Behaviors. in Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:631791.
doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631791 .
Lep, Žan, Ilić, Sandra, Teovanović, Predrag, Hacin Beyazoglu, Kaja, Damnjanović, Kaja, "One Hundred and Sixty-One Days in the Life of the Homopandemicus in Serbia: The Contribution of Information Credibility and Alertness in Predicting Engagement in Protective Behaviors" in Frontiers in Psychology, 12 (2021):631791,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631791 . .

Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic

Teovanović, Predrag; Lukić, Petar; Zupan, Zorana; Lazić, Aleksandra; Ninković, Milica; Žeželj, Iris

(Wiley, Hoboken, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1323
AB  - In the coronavirus "infodemic," people are exposed to official recommendations but also to potentially dangerous pseudoscientific advice claimed to protect against COVID-19. We examined whether irrational beliefs predict adherence to COVID-19 guidelines as well as susceptibility to such misinformation. Irrational beliefs were indexed by belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, COVID-19 knowledge overestimation, type I error cognitive biases, and cognitive intuition. Participants (N = 407) reported (1) how often they followed guidelines (e.g., handwashing, physical distancing), (2) how often they engaged in pseudoscientific practices (e.g., consuming garlic, colloidal silver), and (3) their intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Conspiratorial beliefs predicted all three outcomes in line with our expectations. Cognitive intuition and knowledge overestimation predicted lesser adherence to guidelines, while cognitive biases predicted greater adherence, but also greater use of pseudoscientific practices. Our results suggest an important relation between irrational beliefs and health behaviors, with conspiracy theories being the most detrimental.
PB  - Wiley, Hoboken
T2  - Applied Cognitive Psychology
T1  - Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic
EP  - 496
EP  - 
IS  - 2
SP  - 486
VL  - 35
DO  - 10.1002/acp.3770
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Lazić, Aleksandra and Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In the coronavirus "infodemic," people are exposed to official recommendations but also to potentially dangerous pseudoscientific advice claimed to protect against COVID-19. We examined whether irrational beliefs predict adherence to COVID-19 guidelines as well as susceptibility to such misinformation. Irrational beliefs were indexed by belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, COVID-19 knowledge overestimation, type I error cognitive biases, and cognitive intuition. Participants (N = 407) reported (1) how often they followed guidelines (e.g., handwashing, physical distancing), (2) how often they engaged in pseudoscientific practices (e.g., consuming garlic, colloidal silver), and (3) their intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Conspiratorial beliefs predicted all three outcomes in line with our expectations. Cognitive intuition and knowledge overestimation predicted lesser adherence to guidelines, while cognitive biases predicted greater adherence, but also greater use of pseudoscientific practices. Our results suggest an important relation between irrational beliefs and health behaviors, with conspiracy theories being the most detrimental.",
publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
title = "Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic",
pages = "496--486",
number = "2",
volume = "35",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3770"
}
Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Lazić, A., Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. in Applied Cognitive Psychology
Wiley, Hoboken., 35(2), 486-496.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770
Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Lazić A, Ninković M, Žeželj I. Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. in Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2021;35(2):486-496.
doi:10.1002/acp.3770 .
Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Lazić, Aleksandra, Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic" in Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, no. 2 (2021):486-496,
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770 . .
82
118
28
102

Statistika u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji

Teovanović, Predrag

(Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju (ICF), 2020)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3808
AB  - Statistika je nauka o podacima koja se bavi postupcima prikupljanja, organizovanja i
analiziranja podataka, te tumačenjem i prikazom rezultata tih analiza. Kao saznajno
sredstvo, statistika predstavlja važan aspekt savremenog naučnog metoda čiji su
fundamentalni aspekti zajednički za sve naučne oblasti. Metod i statistiku treba
razlikovati od predmeta istraživanja specifičnih naučnih disciplina. Statistikom se
koriste istraživači u prirodnim, tehničkim, medicinskim i društvenim naukama, pa
tako govorimo o biostatistici, statističkoj fizici, medicinskoj statistici, ekonomskoj
statistici, inženjerskoj statistici, statistici u meteorologiji, kvantitativnoj lingvistici,
statistici u sociologiji, statistici u sportu, statistici u psihologiji, statistici u specijalnoj
edukaciji i rehabilitaciji itd. Ipak, osnovne postavke ovih naizgled različitih statističkih
disciplina suštinski su istovetne. Statistika se bavi podacima bez obzira na to da li se
oni odnose na svojstva atoma i molekula, društvenih pojava, tehnoloških procesa,
tržišnih pokazatelja, fizioloških parametara, vakcina, lekova i tretmana, motora i
mašina, obrazovnih programa, životinjskih migracija, meteoroloških pojava, sportskih
rezultata, učeničkog postignuća, govornog jezika, ili ponašanja i osobina ljudi. Osnovni
cilj statističke analize je da na osnovu mnoštva podataka dođe do pouzdanih zaključaka
o istraživanim fenomenima i njihovim međusobnim odnosima.
Upoznajući statistiku (budući) profesionalci u oblasti specijalne edukacije i rehabilitacije
upoznaju univerzalni jezik naučnog istraživanja što im olakšava sporazumevanje u
širokom interdisciplinarnom polju društvenih i biomedicinskih nauka. Statistika
profesionalcima pomaže u razumevanju i promišljanju rezultata empirijskih istraživanja,
primenjivanju naučnih saznanja u praksi, ali i testiranju pretpostavki generisanih u
kliničkom radu. Takvim delovanjem praktičari postaju i aktivni istraživači, što je radna
uloga koja može napraviti razliku između dobrog i vrsnog profesionalca. Ovaj udžbenik
pisan je sa namerom da pomogne čitaocu u tom nastojanju.
U tekstu su predstavljene konceptualne osnove statističkog metoda, a konkretni statistički
postupci su ilustrovani tipičnim problemima na koje nailaze istraživači u specijalnoj
edukaciji i rehabilitaciji. Prikaz postupaka je praćen primerima analize podataka koje je
moguće izvesti uz pomoć papira i olovke. Upustva za primenu statističkih postupaka u
računarskim programima SPSS i JASP mogu se pronaći u priručnima na koje se referiše
u samom tekstu, a koji predstavljaju korisnu dopunsku literaturu na akademskim kursevima
na kojima se koristi ovaj udžebnik. U pitanju su SPSS priručnik za preživljavanje
autorke Džuli Palant i JASP: Vodič za studente autora Marka Gos–Sampsona. Za potrebe
razrešavanja dilema vezanih za pravila izveštavanja o rezultatima statističkih analiza u
naučnim radovima, čitaocima se preporučuje da konsultuju sedmo izdanje Priručnika za
objavljivanje Američke Psihološke Asocijacije (takozvani APA 7), mada treba imati u vidu
da su osnovna pravila izveštavanja naznačena i u samom tekstu.Prateći sadržaji, poput pitanja i zadataka za proveru znanja, statističkih tablica i
sheme za izbor odgovarajućeg statističkog testa, imaju za cilj da pomognu čitaocu u
savladavanju gradiva i rešavanju praktičnih istraživačkih nedoumica. Metodološki i
statistički koncepti koji se obrađuju u tekstu izlistani su u indeksu pojmova na samom
kraju knjige.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju (ICF)
T1  - Statistika u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji
EP  - 211
SP  - 1
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3808
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Statistika je nauka o podacima koja se bavi postupcima prikupljanja, organizovanja i
analiziranja podataka, te tumačenjem i prikazom rezultata tih analiza. Kao saznajno
sredstvo, statistika predstavlja važan aspekt savremenog naučnog metoda čiji su
fundamentalni aspekti zajednički za sve naučne oblasti. Metod i statistiku treba
razlikovati od predmeta istraživanja specifičnih naučnih disciplina. Statistikom se
koriste istraživači u prirodnim, tehničkim, medicinskim i društvenim naukama, pa
tako govorimo o biostatistici, statističkoj fizici, medicinskoj statistici, ekonomskoj
statistici, inženjerskoj statistici, statistici u meteorologiji, kvantitativnoj lingvistici,
statistici u sociologiji, statistici u sportu, statistici u psihologiji, statistici u specijalnoj
edukaciji i rehabilitaciji itd. Ipak, osnovne postavke ovih naizgled različitih statističkih
disciplina suštinski su istovetne. Statistika se bavi podacima bez obzira na to da li se
oni odnose na svojstva atoma i molekula, društvenih pojava, tehnoloških procesa,
tržišnih pokazatelja, fizioloških parametara, vakcina, lekova i tretmana, motora i
mašina, obrazovnih programa, životinjskih migracija, meteoroloških pojava, sportskih
rezultata, učeničkog postignuća, govornog jezika, ili ponašanja i osobina ljudi. Osnovni
cilj statističke analize je da na osnovu mnoštva podataka dođe do pouzdanih zaključaka
o istraživanim fenomenima i njihovim međusobnim odnosima.
Upoznajući statistiku (budući) profesionalci u oblasti specijalne edukacije i rehabilitacije
upoznaju univerzalni jezik naučnog istraživanja što im olakšava sporazumevanje u
širokom interdisciplinarnom polju društvenih i biomedicinskih nauka. Statistika
profesionalcima pomaže u razumevanju i promišljanju rezultata empirijskih istraživanja,
primenjivanju naučnih saznanja u praksi, ali i testiranju pretpostavki generisanih u
kliničkom radu. Takvim delovanjem praktičari postaju i aktivni istraživači, što je radna
uloga koja može napraviti razliku između dobrog i vrsnog profesionalca. Ovaj udžbenik
pisan je sa namerom da pomogne čitaocu u tom nastojanju.
U tekstu su predstavljene konceptualne osnove statističkog metoda, a konkretni statistički
postupci su ilustrovani tipičnim problemima na koje nailaze istraživači u specijalnoj
edukaciji i rehabilitaciji. Prikaz postupaka je praćen primerima analize podataka koje je
moguće izvesti uz pomoć papira i olovke. Upustva za primenu statističkih postupaka u
računarskim programima SPSS i JASP mogu se pronaći u priručnima na koje se referiše
u samom tekstu, a koji predstavljaju korisnu dopunsku literaturu na akademskim kursevima
na kojima se koristi ovaj udžebnik. U pitanju su SPSS priručnik za preživljavanje
autorke Džuli Palant i JASP: Vodič za studente autora Marka Gos–Sampsona. Za potrebe
razrešavanja dilema vezanih za pravila izveštavanja o rezultatima statističkih analiza u
naučnim radovima, čitaocima se preporučuje da konsultuju sedmo izdanje Priručnika za
objavljivanje Američke Psihološke Asocijacije (takozvani APA 7), mada treba imati u vidu
da su osnovna pravila izveštavanja naznačena i u samom tekstu.Prateći sadržaji, poput pitanja i zadataka za proveru znanja, statističkih tablica i
sheme za izbor odgovarajućeg statističkog testa, imaju za cilj da pomognu čitaocu u
savladavanju gradiva i rešavanju praktičnih istraživačkih nedoumica. Metodološki i
statistički koncepti koji se obrađuju u tekstu izlistani su u indeksu pojmova na samom
kraju knjige.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju (ICF)",
title = "Statistika u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji",
pages = "211-1",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3808"
}
Teovanović, P.. (2020). Statistika u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji. 
Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju (ICF)., 1-211.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3808
Teovanović P. Statistika u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji. 2020;:1-211.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3808 .
Teovanović, Predrag, "Statistika u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji" (2020):1-211,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3808 .

Dual processing in syllogistic reasoning: An individual differences perspective

Teovanović, Predrag

(University of Rijeka, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1237
AB  - The study aimed to examine several assumptions of dual process theories of reasoning by employing individual difference approach. A set of categorical syllogisms was administered to a relatively large sample of participants (N = 247) along with attached confidence rating scales, and measures of intelligence and cognitive reflection. As expected, response accuracy on syllogistic reasoning tasks highly depended on task complexity and the status of belief-logic conflict, thus demonstrating belief-bias on the group level. Individual difference analyses showed that more biased subject also performed poorer on Raven's Matrices (r =.25) and Cognitive Reflection Test (r =.27), which is in line with assumptions that willingness to engage and capacities to carry out type 2 processes both contribute to understanding of rational thinking. Moreover, measures of cognitive decoupling were significantly correlated with the performance on conflict syllogisms (r =.20). Individual differences in sensitivity to conflict detection, on the other side, were not related to reasoning accuracy in general (r =.02). Yet, additional analyses showed that noteworthy correlation between these two can be observed for easier syllogistic reasoning tasks (r =.26). Such results indicate that boundary conditions of conflict detection should be viewed as a function of both tasks' and participants' characteristics.
PB  - University of Rijeka
T2  - Psihologijske Teme
T1  - Dual processing in syllogistic reasoning: An individual differences perspective
EP  - 145
IS  - 1
SP  - 125
VL  - 28
DO  - 10.31820/pt.28.1.7
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The study aimed to examine several assumptions of dual process theories of reasoning by employing individual difference approach. A set of categorical syllogisms was administered to a relatively large sample of participants (N = 247) along with attached confidence rating scales, and measures of intelligence and cognitive reflection. As expected, response accuracy on syllogistic reasoning tasks highly depended on task complexity and the status of belief-logic conflict, thus demonstrating belief-bias on the group level. Individual difference analyses showed that more biased subject also performed poorer on Raven's Matrices (r =.25) and Cognitive Reflection Test (r =.27), which is in line with assumptions that willingness to engage and capacities to carry out type 2 processes both contribute to understanding of rational thinking. Moreover, measures of cognitive decoupling were significantly correlated with the performance on conflict syllogisms (r =.20). Individual differences in sensitivity to conflict detection, on the other side, were not related to reasoning accuracy in general (r =.02). Yet, additional analyses showed that noteworthy correlation between these two can be observed for easier syllogistic reasoning tasks (r =.26). Such results indicate that boundary conditions of conflict detection should be viewed as a function of both tasks' and participants' characteristics.",
publisher = "University of Rijeka",
journal = "Psihologijske Teme",
title = "Dual processing in syllogistic reasoning: An individual differences perspective",
pages = "145-125",
number = "1",
volume = "28",
doi = "10.31820/pt.28.1.7"
}
Teovanović, P.. (2019). Dual processing in syllogistic reasoning: An individual differences perspective. in Psihologijske Teme
University of Rijeka., 28(1), 125-145.
https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.28.1.7
Teovanović P. Dual processing in syllogistic reasoning: An individual differences perspective. in Psihologijske Teme. 2019;28(1):125-145.
doi:10.31820/pt.28.1.7 .
Teovanović, Predrag, "Dual processing in syllogistic reasoning: An individual differences perspective" in Psihologijske Teme, 28, no. 1 (2019):125-145,
https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.28.1.7 . .
1
4
5

Individual Differences in Anchoring Effect: Evidence for the Role of Insufficient Adjustment

Teovanović, Predrag

(Psychopen, Trier, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1201
AB  - Although the anchoring effect is one of the most reliable results of experimental psychology, researchers have only recently begun to examine the role of individual differences in susceptibility to this cognitive bias. Yet, first correlational studies yielded inconsistent results, failing to identify any predictors that have a systematic effect on anchored decisions. The present research seeks to remedy methodological shortcomings of foregoing research by employing modified within-subject anchoring procedure. Results confirmed the robustness of phenomenon in extended paradigm and replicated previous findings on anchor's direction and distance as significant experimental factors of the anchoring effect size. Obtained measures of individual differences in susceptibility to anchoring were fairly reliable but shared only small portion of variability with intelligence, cognitive reflection, and basic personality traits. However, in a group of more reflective subjects, substantial negative correlation between intelligence and anchoring was detected. This finding indicates that, at least for some subjects, effortful cognitive process of adjustment plays role in the emergence of the anchoring effect, which is in line with expectations of dual-process theories of human reasoning.
PB  - Psychopen, Trier
T2  - Europes Journal of Psychology
T1  - Individual Differences in Anchoring Effect: Evidence for the Role of Insufficient Adjustment
EP  - 24
IS  - 1
SP  - 8
VL  - 15
DO  - 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1691
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Although the anchoring effect is one of the most reliable results of experimental psychology, researchers have only recently begun to examine the role of individual differences in susceptibility to this cognitive bias. Yet, first correlational studies yielded inconsistent results, failing to identify any predictors that have a systematic effect on anchored decisions. The present research seeks to remedy methodological shortcomings of foregoing research by employing modified within-subject anchoring procedure. Results confirmed the robustness of phenomenon in extended paradigm and replicated previous findings on anchor's direction and distance as significant experimental factors of the anchoring effect size. Obtained measures of individual differences in susceptibility to anchoring were fairly reliable but shared only small portion of variability with intelligence, cognitive reflection, and basic personality traits. However, in a group of more reflective subjects, substantial negative correlation between intelligence and anchoring was detected. This finding indicates that, at least for some subjects, effortful cognitive process of adjustment plays role in the emergence of the anchoring effect, which is in line with expectations of dual-process theories of human reasoning.",
publisher = "Psychopen, Trier",
journal = "Europes Journal of Psychology",
title = "Individual Differences in Anchoring Effect: Evidence for the Role of Insufficient Adjustment",
pages = "24-8",
number = "1",
volume = "15",
doi = "10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1691"
}
Teovanović, P.. (2019). Individual Differences in Anchoring Effect: Evidence for the Role of Insufficient Adjustment. in Europes Journal of Psychology
Psychopen, Trier., 15(1), 8-24.
https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1691
Teovanović P. Individual Differences in Anchoring Effect: Evidence for the Role of Insufficient Adjustment. in Europes Journal of Psychology. 2019;15(1):8-24.
doi:10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1691 .
Teovanović, Predrag, "Individual Differences in Anchoring Effect: Evidence for the Role of Insufficient Adjustment" in Europes Journal of Psychology, 15, no. 1 (2019):8-24,
https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1691 . .
18
21
8
20

Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Knežević, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Purić, Danka; Bosnjak, Michael; Teovanović, Predrag; Petrović, Boban; Opačić, Goran

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Bosnjak, Michael
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Petrović, Boban
AU  - Opačić, Goran
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1234
AB  - Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN model. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
EP  - 164
SP  - 155
VL  - 143
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Knežević, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Bosnjak, Michael and Teovanović, Predrag and Petrović, Boban and Opačić, Goran",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN model. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis",
pages = "164-155",
volume = "143",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009"
}
Knežević, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Bosnjak, M., Teovanović, P., Petrović, B.,& Opačić, G.. (2019). Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 143, 155-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009
Knežević G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Bosnjak M, Teovanović P, Petrović B, Opačić G. Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;143:155-164.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009 .
Knežević, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Bosnjak, Michael, Teovanović, Predrag, Petrović, Boban, Opačić, Goran, "Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis" in Personality and Individual Differences, 143 (2019):155-164,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009 . .
3
16
9
14

Facilitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Personality Traits on Syllogistic Reasoning

Hadžiahmetović, Nina; Opačić, Goran; Teovanović, Predrag; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka

(2019)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Hadžiahmetović, Nina
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3170
C3  - Proceedings of the XXV scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - Facilitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Personality Traits on Syllogistic Reasoning
EP  - 49
SP  - 47
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3170
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Hadžiahmetović, Nina and Opačić, Goran and Teovanović, Predrag and Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka",
year = "2019",
journal = "Proceedings of the XXV scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "Facilitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Personality Traits on Syllogistic Reasoning",
pages = "49-47",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3170"
}
Hadžiahmetović, N., Opačić, G., Teovanović, P.,& Kolenović-Đapo, J.. (2019). Facilitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Personality Traits on Syllogistic Reasoning. in Proceedings of the XXV scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 47-49.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3170
Hadžiahmetović N, Opačić G, Teovanović P, Kolenović-Đapo J. Facilitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Personality Traits on Syllogistic Reasoning. in Proceedings of the XXV scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2019;:47-49.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3170 .
Hadžiahmetović, Nina, Opačić, Goran, Teovanović, Predrag, Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka, "Facilitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Personality Traits on Syllogistic Reasoning" in Proceedings of the XXV scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2019):47-49,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3170 .

The frame and name of the medical treatment and their influence on health decisions

Damnjanović, Kaja; Ilić, Sandra; Teovanović, Predrag

(Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Damnjanović, Kaja
AU  - Ilić, Sandra
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1191
AB  - Decisions about one's own health range from everyday easy ones, such as taking a vitamin pill, to those made in the situations of life-threatening diseases. When it comes to choosing treatments, patients have difficulty understanding statistical information about the possible outcomes of alternative treatments, such as probabilities and risks. These challenges are especially important in the context of the shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the labelling of the treatment in risky choice decision tasks. The risky choice framing effect (FE) pertains to the systematic preference reversal because different aspects of formally identical situations are emphasized. In the present study, the participants made a forced choice between a non-risky and risky treatment presented in terms of gains and losses. In the first condition surgery was the risky option and in the second it was radiation. In the third condition, the treatments' labels were replaced with ' A' and 'B'. Chi-square tests revealed a significant difference in the proportions of risky choices between the three conditions. The FE was registered only in the first and the second condition, and it was moderate and strong, respectively. When choosing between surgery and radiation, participants' choices were indeed influenced by the naming of the treatment, but not exclusively-they generally preferred surgery, and when it was offered in terms of losses, they preferred it even more.
AB  - Odluke o ličnom zdravlju protežu se od svakodnevnih i lakih, kao što je odluka o uzimanju vitaminskog suplementa, do onih koje se donose u situacijama kada je prisutna životno ugrožavajuća bolest. Pacijenti koji donose odluku o izboru tretmana suočavaju se sa specifičnim izazovima i imaju poteškoća da razumeju statističke podatke o mogućim ishodima alternativnih tretmana, o verovatnoći i o rizicima. Ova problematika je posebno značajna u kontekstu prakse zajedničkog odlučivanja, u kojoj i pacijent, a ne samo lekar, donosi odluku o tome na koji način će se tretirati bolest. Cilj ove studije bio je da se ispita uticaj naziva tretmana u zadacima odlučivanja u uslovima rizika. Efekat okvira rizičnog izbora se odnosi na sistematsku promenu redosleda preferencija koje su različite po rizičnosti. Do toga dolazi usled naglašavanja različitih aspekata identične situacije prilikom prikazivanja opcija donosiocima odluka. U našoj studiji ispitanici su prinudno birali između nerizičnog i rizičnog tretmana, koji su predstavljeni u terminima dobitka i gubitka. U prvoj eksperimentalnoj situaciji, kao rizična opcija predstavljena je operacija, a u drugoj zračenje. U trećem eksperimentu, nazivi tretmana su zamenjeni apstraktnim oznakama A i B. Rezultati pokazuju statistički značajnu razliku u proporcijama rizičnih odgovora između tri eksperimentalne situacije. Efekat okvira je registrovan u prvom i drugom eksperimentu; u prvom umerenog, a u drugom većeg intenziteta. Kada biraju između operacije i zračenja na ispitanike utiče naziv tretmana, ali to ne objašnjava celokupnu varijansu. Po pravilu, preferirali su operaciju, a kada je ona prikazana u terminima gubitka, ta preferencija je bila još jača.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd
T2  - Psihološka istraživanja
T1  - The frame and name of the medical treatment and their influence on health decisions
T1  - Okvir i naziv medicinskog tretmana i njihov uticaj na zdravstvene odluke
EP  - 254
IS  - 2
SP  - 239
VL  - 22
DO  - 10.5937/PSISTRA22-23375
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Damnjanović, Kaja and Ilić, Sandra and Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Decisions about one's own health range from everyday easy ones, such as taking a vitamin pill, to those made in the situations of life-threatening diseases. When it comes to choosing treatments, patients have difficulty understanding statistical information about the possible outcomes of alternative treatments, such as probabilities and risks. These challenges are especially important in the context of the shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the labelling of the treatment in risky choice decision tasks. The risky choice framing effect (FE) pertains to the systematic preference reversal because different aspects of formally identical situations are emphasized. In the present study, the participants made a forced choice between a non-risky and risky treatment presented in terms of gains and losses. In the first condition surgery was the risky option and in the second it was radiation. In the third condition, the treatments' labels were replaced with ' A' and 'B'. Chi-square tests revealed a significant difference in the proportions of risky choices between the three conditions. The FE was registered only in the first and the second condition, and it was moderate and strong, respectively. When choosing between surgery and radiation, participants' choices were indeed influenced by the naming of the treatment, but not exclusively-they generally preferred surgery, and when it was offered in terms of losses, they preferred it even more., Odluke o ličnom zdravlju protežu se od svakodnevnih i lakih, kao što je odluka o uzimanju vitaminskog suplementa, do onih koje se donose u situacijama kada je prisutna životno ugrožavajuća bolest. Pacijenti koji donose odluku o izboru tretmana suočavaju se sa specifičnim izazovima i imaju poteškoća da razumeju statističke podatke o mogućim ishodima alternativnih tretmana, o verovatnoći i o rizicima. Ova problematika je posebno značajna u kontekstu prakse zajedničkog odlučivanja, u kojoj i pacijent, a ne samo lekar, donosi odluku o tome na koji način će se tretirati bolest. Cilj ove studije bio je da se ispita uticaj naziva tretmana u zadacima odlučivanja u uslovima rizika. Efekat okvira rizičnog izbora se odnosi na sistematsku promenu redosleda preferencija koje su različite po rizičnosti. Do toga dolazi usled naglašavanja različitih aspekata identične situacije prilikom prikazivanja opcija donosiocima odluka. U našoj studiji ispitanici su prinudno birali između nerizičnog i rizičnog tretmana, koji su predstavljeni u terminima dobitka i gubitka. U prvoj eksperimentalnoj situaciji, kao rizična opcija predstavljena je operacija, a u drugoj zračenje. U trećem eksperimentu, nazivi tretmana su zamenjeni apstraktnim oznakama A i B. Rezultati pokazuju statistički značajnu razliku u proporcijama rizičnih odgovora između tri eksperimentalne situacije. Efekat okvira je registrovan u prvom i drugom eksperimentu; u prvom umerenog, a u drugom većeg intenziteta. Kada biraju između operacije i zračenja na ispitanike utiče naziv tretmana, ali to ne objašnjava celokupnu varijansu. Po pravilu, preferirali su operaciju, a kada je ona prikazana u terminima gubitka, ta preferencija je bila još jača.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd",
journal = "Psihološka istraživanja",
title = "The frame and name of the medical treatment and their influence on health decisions, Okvir i naziv medicinskog tretmana i njihov uticaj na zdravstvene odluke",
pages = "254-239",
number = "2",
volume = "22",
doi = "10.5937/PSISTRA22-23375"
}
Damnjanović, K., Ilić, S.,& Teovanović, P.. (2019). The frame and name of the medical treatment and their influence on health decisions. in Psihološka istraživanja
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd., 22(2), 239-254.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PSISTRA22-23375
Damnjanović K, Ilić S, Teovanović P. The frame and name of the medical treatment and their influence on health decisions. in Psihološka istraživanja. 2019;22(2):239-254.
doi:10.5937/PSISTRA22-23375 .
Damnjanović, Kaja, Ilić, Sandra, Teovanović, Predrag, "The frame and name of the medical treatment and their influence on health decisions" in Psihološka istraživanja, 22, no. 2 (2019):239-254,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PSISTRA22-23375 . .

Validacija testa kondicionalnog rezonovanja (CRT) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti

Hadžiahmetović, Nina; Opačić, Goran; Teovanović, Predrag; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka

(2018)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Hadžiahmetović, Nina
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3016
T1  - Validacija testa kondicionalnog rezonovanja (CRT) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3016
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Hadžiahmetović, Nina and Opačić, Goran and Teovanović, Predrag and Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka",
year = "2018",
title = "Validacija testa kondicionalnog rezonovanja (CRT) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3016"
}
Hadžiahmetović, N., Opačić, G., Teovanović, P.,& Kolenović-Đapo, J.. (2018). Validacija testa kondicionalnog rezonovanja (CRT) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti. .
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3016
Hadžiahmetović N, Opačić G, Teovanović P, Kolenović-Đapo J. Validacija testa kondicionalnog rezonovanja (CRT) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3016 .
Hadžiahmetović, Nina, Opačić, Goran, Teovanović, Predrag, Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka, "Validacija testa kondicionalnog rezonovanja (CRT) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti" (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3016 .

Validacija Kvazikognitivnog testa ličnosti (K-KOGTEL) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti

Hadžiahmetović, Nina; Opačić, Goran; Teovanović, Predrag; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka

(2018)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Hadžiahmetović, Nina
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3017
C3  - Zbornik sažetaka sa V skupa Sarajevski dani psihologije
T1  - Validacija Kvazikognitivnog testa ličnosti (K-KOGTEL) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti
EP  - M64
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3017
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Hadžiahmetović, Nina and Opačić, Goran and Teovanović, Predrag and Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka",
year = "2018",
journal = "Zbornik sažetaka sa V skupa Sarajevski dani psihologije",
title = "Validacija Kvazikognitivnog testa ličnosti (K-KOGTEL) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti",
pages = "M64",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3017"
}
Hadžiahmetović, N., Opačić, G., Teovanović, P.,& Kolenović-Đapo, J.. (2018). Validacija Kvazikognitivnog testa ličnosti (K-KOGTEL) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti. in Zbornik sažetaka sa V skupa Sarajevski dani psihologije.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3017
Hadžiahmetović N, Opačić G, Teovanović P, Kolenović-Đapo J. Validacija Kvazikognitivnog testa ličnosti (K-KOGTEL) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti. in Zbornik sažetaka sa V skupa Sarajevski dani psihologije. 2018;:null-M64.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3017 .
Hadžiahmetović, Nina, Opačić, Goran, Teovanović, Predrag, Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka, "Validacija Kvazikognitivnog testa ličnosti (K-KOGTEL) u šestofaktorskom prostoru ličnosti" in Zbornik sažetaka sa V skupa Sarajevski dani psihologije (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3017 .

Meta-analiza kao metod integracije empirijskih nalaza

Teovanović, Predrag

(Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 2018)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2936
AB  - Meta-analiza danas predstavlja osnovno sredstvo za kvantitativnu
integraciju rezultata tematski srodnih empirijskih istraživanja sa
ciljem izvlačenja opštijih zaključaka o datoj istraživačkoj oblati. Meta-
analitički nalazi po pravilu imaju visok stepen generalizabilnosti, što je i
osnovni razlog njihove visoke citiranosti, ali i upotrebe prilikom donošenja
informisanih odluka u obrazovnom, zdravstvenom i privrednom kontekstu.
Meta-analiza ne podrazumeva samo statističku analizu rezultata ranijih
studija, nego se odnosi na širi proces koji obuhvata veći broj međusobno za-
visnih koraka počevši od specifikovanja ciljeva istraživanja i definisanja
kriterijuma za izbora studija, preko pretraživanja literature i procene pri-
kladnosti pronađenih studija, pa sve do kodiranja informacija iz ovih studija
i, konačno, njihove statističke analize. U radu su prikazani ovi koraci i zada-
ci kojih ih prate, uz korišćenje ilustrativnog primera iz oblasti specijalne
edukacije i rehabilitacije. Pored konceptualnog određenja i poređenja sa dru-
gim srodnim istraživanjima, razmotrena su i izvesna ograničenja meta-ana-
lize, ali i istaknute njene nesumnjive prednosti.
AB  - Meta-analysis is a quantitative method that
is now widely used to integrate results of
previous researches on a similar topic in
order to reach a general conclusion about
that body of research. Due to the high level
of generalizability of its findings, metaanalyses
are highly appreciated not only in
an academy, but also in other social contexts
where it is often used for evidence-informed
decision making. Meta-analysis encompasses
several steps which include formulating
the initial research question, defining of
criteria for including studies, searching and
retrieving of relevant studies, extracting
critical information from each study, and
analyzing them. In this paper, the major
phases of meta-analysis are described and
illustrated by using concrete research from
the field of special education. Particular
emphasis was put on the procedures that are
most critical to the validity of conclusions.
Besides, a meta-analysis was compared to
similar types of research, and limitations and
advantages of the method were discussed.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
C3  - Metode procene u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji: Zbornik radova
C3  - Zbornik radova - Nacionalni naučni skup
„Metode procene u specijalnoj edukaciji i
rehabilitaciji”, Beograd,Srbija, 24. decembar 2018.
T1  - Meta-analiza kao metod integracije empirijskih nalaza
T1  - Meta-analysis as a method for
Research integration
EP  - 47
SP  - 41
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2936
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Meta-analiza danas predstavlja osnovno sredstvo za kvantitativnu
integraciju rezultata tematski srodnih empirijskih istraživanja sa
ciljem izvlačenja opštijih zaključaka o datoj istraživačkoj oblati. Meta-
analitički nalazi po pravilu imaju visok stepen generalizabilnosti, što je i
osnovni razlog njihove visoke citiranosti, ali i upotrebe prilikom donošenja
informisanih odluka u obrazovnom, zdravstvenom i privrednom kontekstu.
Meta-analiza ne podrazumeva samo statističku analizu rezultata ranijih
studija, nego se odnosi na širi proces koji obuhvata veći broj međusobno za-
visnih koraka počevši od specifikovanja ciljeva istraživanja i definisanja
kriterijuma za izbora studija, preko pretraživanja literature i procene pri-
kladnosti pronađenih studija, pa sve do kodiranja informacija iz ovih studija
i, konačno, njihove statističke analize. U radu su prikazani ovi koraci i zada-
ci kojih ih prate, uz korišćenje ilustrativnog primera iz oblasti specijalne
edukacije i rehabilitacije. Pored konceptualnog određenja i poređenja sa dru-
gim srodnim istraživanjima, razmotrena su i izvesna ograničenja meta-ana-
lize, ali i istaknute njene nesumnjive prednosti., Meta-analysis is a quantitative method that
is now widely used to integrate results of
previous researches on a similar topic in
order to reach a general conclusion about
that body of research. Due to the high level
of generalizability of its findings, metaanalyses
are highly appreciated not only in
an academy, but also in other social contexts
where it is often used for evidence-informed
decision making. Meta-analysis encompasses
several steps which include formulating
the initial research question, defining of
criteria for including studies, searching and
retrieving of relevant studies, extracting
critical information from each study, and
analyzing them. In this paper, the major
phases of meta-analysis are described and
illustrated by using concrete research from
the field of special education. Particular
emphasis was put on the procedures that are
most critical to the validity of conclusions.
Besides, a meta-analysis was compared to
similar types of research, and limitations and
advantages of the method were discussed.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation",
journal = "Metode procene u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji: Zbornik radova, Zbornik radova - Nacionalni naučni skup
„Metode procene u specijalnoj edukaciji i
rehabilitaciji”, Beograd,Srbija, 24. decembar 2018.",
title = "Meta-analiza kao metod integracije empirijskih nalaza, Meta-analysis as a method for
Research integration",
pages = "47-41",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2936"
}
Teovanović, P.. (2018). Meta-analiza kao metod integracije empirijskih nalaza. in Metode procene u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji: Zbornik radova
Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation., 41-47.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2936
Teovanović P. Meta-analiza kao metod integracije empirijskih nalaza. in Metode procene u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji: Zbornik radova. 2018;:41-47.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2936 .
Teovanović, Predrag, "Meta-analiza kao metod integracije empirijskih nalaza" in Metode procene u specijalnoj edukaciji i rehabilitaciji: Zbornik radova (2018):41-47,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2936 .

Može li se neuroticizam mjeriti zadacima silogističkog rezonovanja?

Hadžiahmetović, Nina; Opačić, Goran; Teovanović, Predrag; Đokić, Ratko; Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka

(2016)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Hadžiahmetović, Nina
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Đokić, Ratko
AU  - Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2499
T1  - Može li se neuroticizam mjeriti zadacima silogističkog rezonovanja?
EP  - 37
SP  - 18
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2499
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Hadžiahmetović, Nina and Opačić, Goran and Teovanović, Predrag and Đokić, Ratko and Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka",
year = "2016",
title = "Može li se neuroticizam mjeriti zadacima silogističkog rezonovanja?",
pages = "37-18",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2499"
}
Hadžiahmetović, N., Opačić, G., Teovanović, P., Đokić, R.,& Kolenović-Đapo, J.. (2016). Može li se neuroticizam mjeriti zadacima silogističkog rezonovanja?. , 18-37.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2499
Hadžiahmetović N, Opačić G, Teovanović P, Đokić R, Kolenović-Đapo J. Može li se neuroticizam mjeriti zadacima silogističkog rezonovanja?. 2016;:18-37.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2499 .
Hadžiahmetović, Nina, Opačić, Goran, Teovanović, Predrag, Đokić, Ratko, Kolenović-Đapo, Jadranka, "Može li se neuroticizam mjeriti zadacima silogističkog rezonovanja?" (2016):18-37,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2499 .

Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence

Knežević, Goran; Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Bosnjak, Michael; Purić, Danka; Petrović, Boban; Teovanović, Predrag; Opačić, Goran; Bodroža, Bojana

(Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Bosnjak, Michael
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Petrović, Boban
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Bodroža, Bojana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/980
AB  - Relying on a recent re-conceptualization of psychosis proneness as a personality trait, its relations with the Big Five traits were investigated in a meta-analytic study. This re-conceptualized trait - named Disintegration - is articulated as a broad, hierarchically organized, nine-faceted behavioral disposition. Disintegration is postulated to be a basic personality trait distinct from the Big Five traits. In accordance with this conceptualization, all the articles considered for this meta-analysis carry information on the relationship between Disintegration-like phenomena (referring to various aspects of symptomatology with prefix 'schizo-', both at the clinical and the sub-clinical level), and at least one Big Five trait. The benchmark for assuming distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .40, based on the meta-analytically derived correlations found among the Big Five traits. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and N, E, O, A, and C, respectively: .24, -.27, 0, -.19, and -13. The differences in true correlations between the studies were substantial for each coefficient Three variables were found to moderate Disintegration-personality correlations. The finding about the distinctness of Disintegration from other personality traits can have repercussions on the taxonomy of traits.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence
EP  - 222
SP  - 214
VL  - 95
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Knežević, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Bosnjak, Michael and Purić, Danka and Petrović, Boban and Teovanović, Predrag and Opačić, Goran and Bodroža, Bojana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Relying on a recent re-conceptualization of psychosis proneness as a personality trait, its relations with the Big Five traits were investigated in a meta-analytic study. This re-conceptualized trait - named Disintegration - is articulated as a broad, hierarchically organized, nine-faceted behavioral disposition. Disintegration is postulated to be a basic personality trait distinct from the Big Five traits. In accordance with this conceptualization, all the articles considered for this meta-analysis carry information on the relationship between Disintegration-like phenomena (referring to various aspects of symptomatology with prefix 'schizo-', both at the clinical and the sub-clinical level), and at least one Big Five trait. The benchmark for assuming distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .40, based on the meta-analytically derived correlations found among the Big Five traits. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and N, E, O, A, and C, respectively: .24, -.27, 0, -.19, and -13. The differences in true correlations between the studies were substantial for each coefficient Three variables were found to moderate Disintegration-personality correlations. The finding about the distinctness of Disintegration from other personality traits can have repercussions on the taxonomy of traits.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence",
pages = "222-214",
volume = "95",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044"
}
Knežević, G., Lazarević, L. B., Bosnjak, M., Purić, D., Petrović, B., Teovanović, P., Opačić, G.,& Bodroža, B.. (2016). Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 95, 214-222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044
Knežević G, Lazarević LB, Bosnjak M, Purić D, Petrović B, Teovanović P, Opačić G, Bodroža B. Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2016;95:214-222.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044 .
Knežević, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Bosnjak, Michael, Purić, Danka, Petrović, Boban, Teovanović, Predrag, Opačić, Goran, Bodroža, Bojana, "Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence" in Personality and Individual Differences, 95 (2016):214-222,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044 . .
1
24
21
29

Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis

Lazarević, Ljiljana B.; Bosnjak, Michael; Knežević, Goran; Petrović, Boban; Purić, Danka; Teovanović, Predrag; Opačić, Goran; Bodroža, Bojana

(Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Bosnjak, Michael
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Boban
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Bodroža, Bojana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/989
AB  - This meta-analytic study investigates the relations between Disintegration-like phenomena (i.e., various aspects of symptomatology with the prefix "schizo-," both at the clinical and the subclinical level) and the traits of the Psychobiological Model of Personality (PBMP). The empirically based benchmark for assuming the distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .30. The sample included 26 manuscripts with 30 studies and 424 effect sizes. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and Harm Avoidance, Novelty Seeking, Reward Dependence, Persistence, Self-Directedness, Cooperativeness, and Self-Transcendence: .23, .04, -.15, -.02, -.23, -.16, and .17, respectively. Two variables were found to moderate the Disintegration-Self-Transcendence correlation. Despite the theoretical expectation and some empirical evidence that Self-Transcendence (and other character traits) should capture variations in Disintegration-like phenomena, our results suggest that schizo-type phenomena are not adequately covered by the PBMP.
PB  - Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen
T2  - Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
T1  - Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis
EP  - 215
IS  - 3
SP  - 204
VL  - 224
DO  - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000254
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Bosnjak, Michael and Knežević, Goran and Petrović, Boban and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Opačić, Goran and Bodroža, Bojana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "This meta-analytic study investigates the relations between Disintegration-like phenomena (i.e., various aspects of symptomatology with the prefix "schizo-," both at the clinical and the subclinical level) and the traits of the Psychobiological Model of Personality (PBMP). The empirically based benchmark for assuming the distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .30. The sample included 26 manuscripts with 30 studies and 424 effect sizes. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and Harm Avoidance, Novelty Seeking, Reward Dependence, Persistence, Self-Directedness, Cooperativeness, and Self-Transcendence: .23, .04, -.15, -.02, -.23, -.16, and .17, respectively. Two variables were found to moderate the Disintegration-Self-Transcendence correlation. Despite the theoretical expectation and some empirical evidence that Self-Transcendence (and other character traits) should capture variations in Disintegration-like phenomena, our results suggest that schizo-type phenomena are not adequately covered by the PBMP.",
publisher = "Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen",
journal = "Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology",
title = "Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis",
pages = "215-204",
number = "3",
volume = "224",
doi = "10.1027/2151-2604/a000254"
}
Lazarević, L. B., Bosnjak, M., Knežević, G., Petrović, B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Opačić, G.,& Bodroža, B.. (2016). Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis. in Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen., 224(3), 204-215.
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000254
Lazarević LB, Bosnjak M, Knežević G, Petrović B, Purić D, Teovanović P, Opačić G, Bodroža B. Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis. in Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology. 2016;224(3):204-215.
doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000254 .
Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Bosnjak, Michael, Knežević, Goran, Petrović, Boban, Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Opačić, Goran, Bodroža, Bojana, "Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis" in Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 224, no. 3 (2016):204-215,
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000254 . .
1
11
9
12

Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality

Teovanović, Predrag; Knežević, Goran; Stankov, Lazar

(Elsevier Science Inc, New York, 2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Stankov, Lazar
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/923
AB  - In this paper we seek to gain an improved understanding of the structure of cognitive biases and their relationship with measures of intelligence and relevant non-cognitive constructs. We report on the outcomes of a study based on a heterogeneous set of seven cognitive biases - anchoring effect, belief bias, overconfidence bias, hindsight bias, base rate neglect, outcome bias and sunk cost effect. New scales for the assessment of these biases were administered to 243 undergraduate students along with measures of fluid (Gf) and crystallized (Gc) intelligence, a Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), Openness/Intellect (O/I) scale and Need for Cognition (NFC) scale. The expected experimental results were confirmed - i.e., each normatively irrelevant variable significantly influenced participants' responses. Also, with the exception of hindsight bias, all cognitive biases showed satisfactory reliability estimates (alpha s > .70). However, correlations among the cognitive bias measures were low (rs  lt  .20). Although exploratory factor analysis produced two factors, their robustness was doubtful. Cognitive bias measures were also relatively independent (rs  lt  .25) from the Gf, Gc, CRT, O/I and NFC and they define separate latent factors. This pattern of results suggests that a major part of the reliable variance of cognitive bias tasks is unique, and implies that a one-factor model of rational behavior is not plausible.
PB  - Elsevier Science Inc, New York
T2  - Intelligence
T1  - Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality
EP  - 86
SP  - 75
VL  - 50
DO  - 10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag and Knežević, Goran and Stankov, Lazar",
year = "2015",
abstract = "In this paper we seek to gain an improved understanding of the structure of cognitive biases and their relationship with measures of intelligence and relevant non-cognitive constructs. We report on the outcomes of a study based on a heterogeneous set of seven cognitive biases - anchoring effect, belief bias, overconfidence bias, hindsight bias, base rate neglect, outcome bias and sunk cost effect. New scales for the assessment of these biases were administered to 243 undergraduate students along with measures of fluid (Gf) and crystallized (Gc) intelligence, a Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), Openness/Intellect (O/I) scale and Need for Cognition (NFC) scale. The expected experimental results were confirmed - i.e., each normatively irrelevant variable significantly influenced participants' responses. Also, with the exception of hindsight bias, all cognitive biases showed satisfactory reliability estimates (alpha s > .70). However, correlations among the cognitive bias measures were low (rs  lt  .20). Although exploratory factor analysis produced two factors, their robustness was doubtful. Cognitive bias measures were also relatively independent (rs  lt  .25) from the Gf, Gc, CRT, O/I and NFC and they define separate latent factors. This pattern of results suggests that a major part of the reliable variance of cognitive bias tasks is unique, and implies that a one-factor model of rational behavior is not plausible.",
publisher = "Elsevier Science Inc, New York",
journal = "Intelligence",
title = "Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality",
pages = "86-75",
volume = "50",
doi = "10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008"
}
Teovanović, P., Knežević, G.,& Stankov, L.. (2015). Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality. in Intelligence
Elsevier Science Inc, New York., 50, 75-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008
Teovanović P, Knežević G, Stankov L. Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality. in Intelligence. 2015;50:75-86.
doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008 .
Teovanović, Predrag, Knežević, Goran, Stankov, Lazar, "Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality" in Intelligence, 50 (2015):75-86,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008 . .
39
53
35
55

Susceptibility to cognitive biases

Teovanović, Predrag

(Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, 2013)

TY  - THES
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/3303
UR  - http://eteze.bg.ac.rs/application/showtheses?thesesId=1236
UR  - https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:8171/bdef:Content/download
UR  - http://vbs.rs/scripts/cobiss?command=DISPLAY&base=70036&RID=523571863
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6
AB  - Cognitive biases, predictable deviations of cognitive processes' outcomes from rational normatives, are examined in eight studies by using a methodological and conceptual apparatus of differential psychology. Anchoring effect, the common human tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered, was the subject of the first study. Apart from confirming curvilinearity of the anchor-distance function, results revealed that factor of fluid intelligence (gf) effects this quadratic function in a way that more intelligent subjects have the same range of plausible answers as other subjects, but they consider a wider range of anchor values as plausible. Their response pattern can be perceived as a strategy of maintaining lower risk in a wider range of values, which at the bivariate level results in the absence of correlation between gf and anchoring effect. Direct gf effect on anchoring, observed in the conditions of high cognitive reflection, speaks in favour of the assumption that, besides automatic processes (selective accessibility), the anchoring effect is also influenced by serial processes (insufficient adjustment), which is in compliance with the general notion of dual process theories (DPT). Belief bias, effect of the empirical status of a conclusion on the outcome of abstract reasoning process, was the subject of the second study. Effect is consistently demonstrated in four basic types of syllogism by a decline in achievement after introducing the conflict between empirical and logical conclusion statuses. In compliance with DPT expectations, gf predicts individual differences in the subjects’ achievements when plausibility and validity of conclusion are in conflict, but not when there is a concurrence between them. In the same conditions, the measures of a cognitive reflection incrementally contribute to the (explanation) of the achievement variance, which can also be understood as a confirmation of the assumption that individual differences in rational reasoning cannot be reduced to intelligence. People’s systematic tendency of overestimating their own abilities is traditionally expressed through the score of difference between subjective and objective probability of giving correct answers, namely the overconfidence effect. In order to avoid an objection about the algebra origin of bias measure in the scores of achievement (intelligence), the third study empirically investigates alternative measures. Results show that achievement estimations of more intelligent subjects are more discriminative, particularly that the more intelligent subjects are more confident about their correct answers while less confident about the wrong ones...
AB  - Kognitivne pristrasnosti, empirijski fenomeni sistematskog odstupanja ishoda kognitivnih procesa od racionalnih normativa, istraženi su kroz osam studija korišćenjem metodološkog i pojmovnog aparata psihologije individualnih razlika. Efekat ukotvljavanja, koji se tiče predvidive sklonosti ljudi da zasnivaju procene različitih vrednosti na irelevantnim numeričkim informacijama, bio je predmet prve studije. Pored toga što potvrđuju postojanje krivolinijskog odnosa između stepena udaljenosti kotve i veličine efekta ukotvljavanja, rezultati pokazuju da fluidna inteligencija oblikuje kvadratnu funkciju ukotvljavanja na takav način da inteligentniji ispitanici imaju isti raspon plauzabilnih odgovora kao i ostali subjekti, ali da plauzabilnim doživljavaju širi raspon vrednosti kotvi. Inteligentniji obrazac odgovora može se razumeti kao strategija prihvatanja niže stope rizika u širem rasponu vrednosti, što na bivarijatnom nivou rezultuje odsustvom povezanosti inteligencije i ukupne veličine efekta ukotvljavanja. Direktan efekat inteligencije na veličinu efekta ukotvljavanja zabeležen je u uslovima visoke reflektivnosti. Ovi nalazi su u skladu sa pretpostavkom da, pored automatskih (selektivna dostupnost), razumevanju efekta ukotvljavanja doprinose i serijalni procesi (nedovoljno podešavanje), što je saglasno opštem stanovištu teorija dualnih procesa (TDP). Pristrasnost uverenja, koja predstavlja efekat empirijskog statusa zaključka na ishode procesa apstraktnog rezonovanja, bila je predmet druge studije. Efekat uverljivosti dosledno je demonstriran na četiri osnovna tipa silogizma padom postignuća nakon uvođenja konflikta između empirijskog i logičkog statusa zaključka. U skladu sa očekivanjima TDP, faktor fluidne inteligencije predviđa individualne razlike u postignuću ispitanika onda kada su uverljivost i validnost zaključka u konfliktu, ali ne i onda kada su usaglašene. Pored toga, mere reflektivnog uma u uslovima konflikta ostvaruju značajne inkrementalne doprinose razumevanju varijanse postignuća, što ukazuje na to da individualne razlike u racionalnom mišljenju nisu svodive na inteligenciju. Pristrasnost preteranog pouzdanja, koja se odnosi na sistematsku sklonost ljudi da precenjuju vlastite sposobnosti, tradicionalno se izražava putem skora razlike između subjektivne i objektivne verovatnoće davanja tačnih odgovora, i predstavlja predmet treće studije. Kako bi se izbegao prigovor o algebarskom poreklu mere pristrasnosti u skorovima postignuća (inteligencije), u trećoj studiji su empirijski razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci alternativnih mera. Rezultati pokazuju da su subjektivne procene inteligentnijih subjekata diskriminativnije, odnosno da su inteligentniji ispitanici pouzdaniji u svoje tačne i manje pouzdani u svoje pogrešne odgovore, ali i da mere pouzdanja međusobno koreliraju visoko bez obzira na to da li se odnose na tačne ili pogrešne odgovore...
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet
T2  - Univerzitet u Beogradu
T1  - Susceptibility to cognitive biases
T1  - Sklonost kognitivnim pristrasnostima
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_3303
ER  - 
@phdthesis{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Cognitive biases, predictable deviations of cognitive processes' outcomes from rational normatives, are examined in eight studies by using a methodological and conceptual apparatus of differential psychology. Anchoring effect, the common human tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered, was the subject of the first study. Apart from confirming curvilinearity of the anchor-distance function, results revealed that factor of fluid intelligence (gf) effects this quadratic function in a way that more intelligent subjects have the same range of plausible answers as other subjects, but they consider a wider range of anchor values as plausible. Their response pattern can be perceived as a strategy of maintaining lower risk in a wider range of values, which at the bivariate level results in the absence of correlation between gf and anchoring effect. Direct gf effect on anchoring, observed in the conditions of high cognitive reflection, speaks in favour of the assumption that, besides automatic processes (selective accessibility), the anchoring effect is also influenced by serial processes (insufficient adjustment), which is in compliance with the general notion of dual process theories (DPT). Belief bias, effect of the empirical status of a conclusion on the outcome of abstract reasoning process, was the subject of the second study. Effect is consistently demonstrated in four basic types of syllogism by a decline in achievement after introducing the conflict between empirical and logical conclusion statuses. In compliance with DPT expectations, gf predicts individual differences in the subjects’ achievements when plausibility and validity of conclusion are in conflict, but not when there is a concurrence between them. In the same conditions, the measures of a cognitive reflection incrementally contribute to the (explanation) of the achievement variance, which can also be understood as a confirmation of the assumption that individual differences in rational reasoning cannot be reduced to intelligence. People’s systematic tendency of overestimating their own abilities is traditionally expressed through the score of difference between subjective and objective probability of giving correct answers, namely the overconfidence effect. In order to avoid an objection about the algebra origin of bias measure in the scores of achievement (intelligence), the third study empirically investigates alternative measures. Results show that achievement estimations of more intelligent subjects are more discriminative, particularly that the more intelligent subjects are more confident about their correct answers while less confident about the wrong ones..., Kognitivne pristrasnosti, empirijski fenomeni sistematskog odstupanja ishoda kognitivnih procesa od racionalnih normativa, istraženi su kroz osam studija korišćenjem metodološkog i pojmovnog aparata psihologije individualnih razlika. Efekat ukotvljavanja, koji se tiče predvidive sklonosti ljudi da zasnivaju procene različitih vrednosti na irelevantnim numeričkim informacijama, bio je predmet prve studije. Pored toga što potvrđuju postojanje krivolinijskog odnosa između stepena udaljenosti kotve i veličine efekta ukotvljavanja, rezultati pokazuju da fluidna inteligencija oblikuje kvadratnu funkciju ukotvljavanja na takav način da inteligentniji ispitanici imaju isti raspon plauzabilnih odgovora kao i ostali subjekti, ali da plauzabilnim doživljavaju širi raspon vrednosti kotvi. Inteligentniji obrazac odgovora može se razumeti kao strategija prihvatanja niže stope rizika u širem rasponu vrednosti, što na bivarijatnom nivou rezultuje odsustvom povezanosti inteligencije i ukupne veličine efekta ukotvljavanja. Direktan efekat inteligencije na veličinu efekta ukotvljavanja zabeležen je u uslovima visoke reflektivnosti. Ovi nalazi su u skladu sa pretpostavkom da, pored automatskih (selektivna dostupnost), razumevanju efekta ukotvljavanja doprinose i serijalni procesi (nedovoljno podešavanje), što je saglasno opštem stanovištu teorija dualnih procesa (TDP). Pristrasnost uverenja, koja predstavlja efekat empirijskog statusa zaključka na ishode procesa apstraktnog rezonovanja, bila je predmet druge studije. Efekat uverljivosti dosledno je demonstriran na četiri osnovna tipa silogizma padom postignuća nakon uvođenja konflikta između empirijskog i logičkog statusa zaključka. U skladu sa očekivanjima TDP, faktor fluidne inteligencije predviđa individualne razlike u postignuću ispitanika onda kada su uverljivost i validnost zaključka u konfliktu, ali ne i onda kada su usaglašene. Pored toga, mere reflektivnog uma u uslovima konflikta ostvaruju značajne inkrementalne doprinose razumevanju varijanse postignuća, što ukazuje na to da individualne razlike u racionalnom mišljenju nisu svodive na inteligenciju. Pristrasnost preteranog pouzdanja, koja se odnosi na sistematsku sklonost ljudi da precenjuju vlastite sposobnosti, tradicionalno se izražava putem skora razlike između subjektivne i objektivne verovatnoće davanja tačnih odgovora, i predstavlja predmet treće studije. Kako bi se izbegao prigovor o algebarskom poreklu mere pristrasnosti u skorovima postignuća (inteligencije), u trećoj studiji su empirijski razmotrene prednosti i nedostaci alternativnih mera. Rezultati pokazuju da su subjektivne procene inteligentnijih subjekata diskriminativnije, odnosno da su inteligentniji ispitanici pouzdaniji u svoje tačne i manje pouzdani u svoje pogrešne odgovore, ali i da mere pouzdanja međusobno koreliraju visoko bez obzira na to da li se odnose na tačne ili pogrešne odgovore...",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Univerzitet u Beogradu",
title = "Susceptibility to cognitive biases, Sklonost kognitivnim pristrasnostima",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_3303"
}
Teovanović, P.. (2013). Susceptibility to cognitive biases. in Univerzitet u Beogradu
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_3303
Teovanović P. Susceptibility to cognitive biases. in Univerzitet u Beogradu. 2013;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_3303 .
Teovanović, Predrag, "Susceptibility to cognitive biases" in Univerzitet u Beogradu (2013),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_3303 .

Modeli latentnog rasta u longitudinalnim istraživanjima

Teovanović, Predrag

(2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2221
T2  - Primenjena psihologija
T1  - Modeli latentnog rasta u longitudinalnim istraživanjima
EP  - 248
IS  - 3
SP  - 231
VL  - 6
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2221
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2013",
journal = "Primenjena psihologija",
title = "Modeli latentnog rasta u longitudinalnim istraživanjima",
pages = "248-231",
number = "3",
volume = "6",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2221"
}
Teovanović, P.. (2013). Modeli latentnog rasta u longitudinalnim istraživanjima. in Primenjena psihologija, 6(3), 231-248.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2221
Teovanović P. Modeli latentnog rasta u longitudinalnim istraživanjima. in Primenjena psihologija. 2013;6(3):231-248.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2221 .
Teovanović, Predrag, "Modeli latentnog rasta u longitudinalnim istraživanjima" in Primenjena psihologija, 6, no. 3 (2013):231-248,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_2221 .

Kvalitet odnosa između braće i sestara u alkoholičarskim porodicama

Damnjanović, Kaja; Teovanović, Predrag

(Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 2011)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Damnjanović, Kaja
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4399
AB  - Odnos izme�����u braće i sestara (siblinga) je najtrajnija porodična relacija. Premda su
deo porodičnog sistema, siblinške relacije imaju svojerodne karakteristike, koje se mogu
razlikovati u specifičnim porodičnim okolnostima. Ciljevi ovog istraživanja su adaptacija i
provera metrijskih odlika Upitnika za procenu kvaliteta odnosa izme�����u braće i sestara
(SRQ, Sibling Relationship Questionnaire), te njegova validacija putem pore�����enja
dimenzija siblinških odnosa u alkoholičarkim i funkcionalnim porodicama. U prvoj studiji
je ispitano 322 ispitanika, a najviši prosečni skorovi su registrovani na subskalama
Naklonjenost (M=4.15), Divljenje prema siblingu (M=3.74), Divljenje od strane siblinga
(M=3.65) i Prosocijalno ponašanje (M=3.59), a najniži na subskalama Takmičenje
(M=2.22), Dominantnost siblinga (M=2.65) i Dominantnost nad siblingom (2.65), što
ukazuje na ulogu i značaj siblinških odnosa kod adolescenata. Iako raspodele skorova
dosledno odstupaju od normalne distribucije, pouzdanost subskala iskazana u terminima
unutrašnje doslednosti je relativno zadovoljavajuća. U drugoj studiji su pore�����ene razlike u
prosečnim skorovima na subkslama i faktorima SRQ upitnika u dve grupe ispitanika (iz
alkoholočarskih porodica i iz kontrolne grupe), pri čemu je kontrola konfundirajućih
varijabli sprovedena tehnikom sparivanja. Unutar alkoholičarskih porodica postoji veća
pristrasnost majke u smislu favorizovanja samog ispitanika u odnosu na drugog siblinga
(U=226, p<.01), a dominantnost koju ispitanici iskazuju nad svojim siblingom je niža u
odnosu na kontrolnu grupu (U=256.5; p<.01). Pored toga, u siblinškom odnosu unutar
alkoholičarske porodice je značajno niža brižnost, odnosno nega prema bratu/sestri
(U=252, p<.01), a povišeno suparništvo (U=290.5; p<.05). Posmatrano na nivou
faktorskih skorova, ispitanici iz alkoholičarskih porodica pokazuju veći intenzitet rivaliteta
prema siblinzima (U=269; p<.01), dok istovremeno izveštavaju da imaju manju moć,
odnosno nepovoljniji relativni status unutar siblinške dijade (U=273.5; p<.01). Dobijeni
nalazi su u skladu sa hipotezom komplementarnosti porodičnih i siblinških odnosa.
AB  - The relationship between brothers and sisters is the longest-lasting family relation.
Although they are part of a family system, sibling relationships have distinctive
characteristics, which can differ in specific family circumstances. The goals of this
research are the adaptation and testing of metric characteristics of Sibling Relationship
Questionnaire (SRQ), as well as the validation through comparing dimensions of sibling
relationships between alcoholic and functional families. In the first of the two studies, 322
participants were examined, the highest scores were registered on subscales of Affection
(M=4.15), Admiration of Sibling (M=3.47), Admiration by Sibling (M=3.65)
and Prosocial (M=3.59), and the lowest scores were on subscales of Competition
(M=2.22), Dominance of Sibling (M=2.65) and Dominance by Sibling (M=2.65), which
indicates the role and significance of sibling relationships in adolescents. Although score
distributions consistently deviate from normal distribution, the reliability of subscales in
terms of internal consistency is relatively satisfying. In the second study a comparison of
average scores on subscales and factors of SRQ was made between two groups of
participants (from alcoholic families and from a control group). Control
of confounding variables was conducted through pairing. In alcoholic families there is a
bigger maternal partiality, compared to their siblings, participants are more favoured by
their mothers (U=226, p<.01), and also less dominative over their siblings in comparison
to the control group (U=256.5; p<.01). Moreover, sibling relationships in
alcoholic familes are characterised with significantly lower nurturance of sibling (U=252,
p<.01) and higher antagonism (U=290.5; p<.05). Factors scores show
that siblings from alcoholic families display rivalry of higher intensity (U=269; p<.01),
while, at the same time, report that they have less power – that is, that their relative status
in the sibling dyad is adverse (U=273.5; p<.01). Results are compatible with the hypothesis
of complementarity of family and sibling relations.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
C3  - Zbornik radova - 5. Međunarodni naučni skup „Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas“, Zlatibor, 24-27. septembar 2011
T1  - Kvalitet odnosa između braće i sestara u alkoholičarskim porodicama
T1  - Sibling relations in alcoholic families
EP  - 274
SP  - 268
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4399
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Damnjanović, Kaja and Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2011",
abstract = "Odnos izme�����u braće i sestara (siblinga) je najtrajnija porodična relacija. Premda su
deo porodičnog sistema, siblinške relacije imaju svojerodne karakteristike, koje se mogu
razlikovati u specifičnim porodičnim okolnostima. Ciljevi ovog istraživanja su adaptacija i
provera metrijskih odlika Upitnika za procenu kvaliteta odnosa izme�����u braće i sestara
(SRQ, Sibling Relationship Questionnaire), te njegova validacija putem pore�����enja
dimenzija siblinških odnosa u alkoholičarkim i funkcionalnim porodicama. U prvoj studiji
je ispitano 322 ispitanika, a najviši prosečni skorovi su registrovani na subskalama
Naklonjenost (M=4.15), Divljenje prema siblingu (M=3.74), Divljenje od strane siblinga
(M=3.65) i Prosocijalno ponašanje (M=3.59), a najniži na subskalama Takmičenje
(M=2.22), Dominantnost siblinga (M=2.65) i Dominantnost nad siblingom (2.65), što
ukazuje na ulogu i značaj siblinških odnosa kod adolescenata. Iako raspodele skorova
dosledno odstupaju od normalne distribucije, pouzdanost subskala iskazana u terminima
unutrašnje doslednosti je relativno zadovoljavajuća. U drugoj studiji su pore�����ene razlike u
prosečnim skorovima na subkslama i faktorima SRQ upitnika u dve grupe ispitanika (iz
alkoholočarskih porodica i iz kontrolne grupe), pri čemu je kontrola konfundirajućih
varijabli sprovedena tehnikom sparivanja. Unutar alkoholičarskih porodica postoji veća
pristrasnost majke u smislu favorizovanja samog ispitanika u odnosu na drugog siblinga
(U=226, p<.01), a dominantnost koju ispitanici iskazuju nad svojim siblingom je niža u
odnosu na kontrolnu grupu (U=256.5; p<.01). Pored toga, u siblinškom odnosu unutar
alkoholičarske porodice je značajno niža brižnost, odnosno nega prema bratu/sestri
(U=252, p<.01), a povišeno suparništvo (U=290.5; p<.05). Posmatrano na nivou
faktorskih skorova, ispitanici iz alkoholičarskih porodica pokazuju veći intenzitet rivaliteta
prema siblinzima (U=269; p<.01), dok istovremeno izveštavaju da imaju manju moć,
odnosno nepovoljniji relativni status unutar siblinške dijade (U=273.5; p<.01). Dobijeni
nalazi su u skladu sa hipotezom komplementarnosti porodičnih i siblinških odnosa., The relationship between brothers and sisters is the longest-lasting family relation.
Although they are part of a family system, sibling relationships have distinctive
characteristics, which can differ in specific family circumstances. The goals of this
research are the adaptation and testing of metric characteristics of Sibling Relationship
Questionnaire (SRQ), as well as the validation through comparing dimensions of sibling
relationships between alcoholic and functional families. In the first of the two studies, 322
participants were examined, the highest scores were registered on subscales of Affection
(M=4.15), Admiration of Sibling (M=3.47), Admiration by Sibling (M=3.65)
and Prosocial (M=3.59), and the lowest scores were on subscales of Competition
(M=2.22), Dominance of Sibling (M=2.65) and Dominance by Sibling (M=2.65), which
indicates the role and significance of sibling relationships in adolescents. Although score
distributions consistently deviate from normal distribution, the reliability of subscales in
terms of internal consistency is relatively satisfying. In the second study a comparison of
average scores on subscales and factors of SRQ was made between two groups of
participants (from alcoholic families and from a control group). Control
of confounding variables was conducted through pairing. In alcoholic families there is a
bigger maternal partiality, compared to their siblings, participants are more favoured by
their mothers (U=226, p<.01), and also less dominative over their siblings in comparison
to the control group (U=256.5; p<.01). Moreover, sibling relationships in
alcoholic familes are characterised with significantly lower nurturance of sibling (U=252,
p<.01) and higher antagonism (U=290.5; p<.05). Factors scores show
that siblings from alcoholic families display rivalry of higher intensity (U=269; p<.01),
while, at the same time, report that they have less power – that is, that their relative status
in the sibling dyad is adverse (U=273.5; p<.01). Results are compatible with the hypothesis
of complementarity of family and sibling relations.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation",
journal = "Zbornik radova - 5. Međunarodni naučni skup „Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas“, Zlatibor, 24-27. septembar 2011",
title = "Kvalitet odnosa između braće i sestara u alkoholičarskim porodicama, Sibling relations in alcoholic families",
pages = "274-268",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4399"
}
Damnjanović, K.,& Teovanović, P.. (2011). Kvalitet odnosa između braće i sestara u alkoholičarskim porodicama. in Zbornik radova - 5. Međunarodni naučni skup „Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas“, Zlatibor, 24-27. septembar 2011
Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation., 268-274.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4399
Damnjanović K, Teovanović P. Kvalitet odnosa između braće i sestara u alkoholičarskim porodicama. in Zbornik radova - 5. Međunarodni naučni skup „Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas“, Zlatibor, 24-27. septembar 2011. 2011;:268-274.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4399 .
Damnjanović, Kaja, Teovanović, Predrag, "Kvalitet odnosa između braće i sestara u alkoholičarskim porodicama" in Zbornik radova - 5. Međunarodni naučni skup „Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas“, Zlatibor, 24-27. septembar 2011 (2011):268-274,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4399 .

O neinteligibilnosti rasizacije inteligencije

Teovanović, Predrag

(Časopis Centra za etnološka i antropološka istraživanja (CEAI) Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu., 2010)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3270
AB  - IQ argumentom se tvrdi da (1) postoje rasne, odnosno grupne razlike u inteligenciji
između crnaca i belaca, da je (2) inteligencija visoko nasledna, te su i (3)
date razlike urođene, odnosno odražavaju različitosti u genetičkom materijalu. Nalazi
populacionih genetičara sugerišu da je pojam rase, baš kao i pojam etničke zajednice,
samo društvena konstrukcija, kulturološka kategorija, a ne biološki (genetički) utemeljen
kriterijum klasifikacije. Posmatrano sa te pozicije, unapred je obesmišljen svaki
pokušaj naučnih rasista da rasne razlike u inteligenciji proglase naslednim. Uproks tome,
a polazeći od empirijske činjenice da na testovima sposobnosti belci (kao društvena
zajednica, skup individua koje se deklarišu kao članovi bele rase/populacije/grupe)
dosledno postižu za oko 15 jedinica viši prosečni IQ rezultat u odnosu na crnce (kao
društvenu zajednicu...), naučni rasisti su skloni da ove razlike proglase urođenim, tvrdeći
da je inteligencija visoko nasledna sposobnost. Stoga će u radu više pažnje biti
posvećeno drugoj premisi. Cilj je pokazati kako sam nalaz o grupnim razlikama u
svojoj deskriptivnoj formi nije rasistički, ali da takvim postaje prelaskom na nivo neutemeljenog
nativističkog objašnjenja. Posebno su razmotreni metodološki propusti naučnih
rasista, a ukazano je i na ulogu koju neosnovani zaključci imaju u održavanju
društvenih nejednakosti.
AB  - IQ argument alleges that (1) there are racial, i.e. group differences in intelligence
between Black and White people, and that (2) intelligence is highly hereditary,
thus (3) given differences are congenital and they reflect diversities
in genetic material. Results of population geneticists suggest that the notion of
race (and the notion of ethnic group likewise) is only a social construct, a cultural
category, and not a biologically (genetically) founded criterion of classification.
Having this in mind, any attempt by scientific racists to declare racial
differences in intelligence hereditary is beforehand nonsensical. In spite of
this, and based on the empirical fact that White people (as a social group, a
collection of individuals declaring themselves being of white race/population/
group) consistently score higher average IQ on ability tests for approximately
15 units more than Black people (as social group…), scientific racist
incline to proclaim these differences as being congenital, claiming at the same
time that intelligence is a highly hereditary ability. Thus, this paper will pri marily focus on the other claim. The aim is to show that the finding on group
differences in its descriptive form is not itself racist, but that it becomes such
by advancing to the level of unfounded nativist explanation. Also, methodological
errors of scientific racists are addressed separately, as well as the role
which unfounded conclusions have in conservation of social inequality.
PB  - Časopis Centra za etnološka i antropološka istraživanja (CEAI) Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.
T2  - Antropologija
T2  - Antropologija/anthropology
T1  - O neinteligibilnosti rasizacije inteligencije
T1  - On uninteligibility of racialization of intelligence
EP  - 131
IS  - 10
SP  - 111
VL  - 2
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3270
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag",
year = "2010",
abstract = "IQ argumentom se tvrdi da (1) postoje rasne, odnosno grupne razlike u inteligenciji
između crnaca i belaca, da je (2) inteligencija visoko nasledna, te su i (3)
date razlike urođene, odnosno odražavaju različitosti u genetičkom materijalu. Nalazi
populacionih genetičara sugerišu da je pojam rase, baš kao i pojam etničke zajednice,
samo društvena konstrukcija, kulturološka kategorija, a ne biološki (genetički) utemeljen
kriterijum klasifikacije. Posmatrano sa te pozicije, unapred je obesmišljen svaki
pokušaj naučnih rasista da rasne razlike u inteligenciji proglase naslednim. Uproks tome,
a polazeći od empirijske činjenice da na testovima sposobnosti belci (kao društvena
zajednica, skup individua koje se deklarišu kao članovi bele rase/populacije/grupe)
dosledno postižu za oko 15 jedinica viši prosečni IQ rezultat u odnosu na crnce (kao
društvenu zajednicu...), naučni rasisti su skloni da ove razlike proglase urođenim, tvrdeći
da je inteligencija visoko nasledna sposobnost. Stoga će u radu više pažnje biti
posvećeno drugoj premisi. Cilj je pokazati kako sam nalaz o grupnim razlikama u
svojoj deskriptivnoj formi nije rasistički, ali da takvim postaje prelaskom na nivo neutemeljenog
nativističkog objašnjenja. Posebno su razmotreni metodološki propusti naučnih
rasista, a ukazano je i na ulogu koju neosnovani zaključci imaju u održavanju
društvenih nejednakosti., IQ argument alleges that (1) there are racial, i.e. group differences in intelligence
between Black and White people, and that (2) intelligence is highly hereditary,
thus (3) given differences are congenital and they reflect diversities
in genetic material. Results of population geneticists suggest that the notion of
race (and the notion of ethnic group likewise) is only a social construct, a cultural
category, and not a biologically (genetically) founded criterion of classification.
Having this in mind, any attempt by scientific racists to declare racial
differences in intelligence hereditary is beforehand nonsensical. In spite of
this, and based on the empirical fact that White people (as a social group, a
collection of individuals declaring themselves being of white race/population/
group) consistently score higher average IQ on ability tests for approximately
15 units more than Black people (as social group…), scientific racist
incline to proclaim these differences as being congenital, claiming at the same
time that intelligence is a highly hereditary ability. Thus, this paper will pri marily focus on the other claim. The aim is to show that the finding on group
differences in its descriptive form is not itself racist, but that it becomes such
by advancing to the level of unfounded nativist explanation. Also, methodological
errors of scientific racists are addressed separately, as well as the role
which unfounded conclusions have in conservation of social inequality.",
publisher = "Časopis Centra za etnološka i antropološka istraživanja (CEAI) Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.",
journal = "Antropologija, Antropologija/anthropology",
title = "O neinteligibilnosti rasizacije inteligencije, On uninteligibility of racialization of intelligence",
pages = "131-111",
number = "10",
volume = "2",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3270"
}
Teovanović, P.. (2010). O neinteligibilnosti rasizacije inteligencije. in Antropologija
Časopis Centra za etnološka i antropološka istraživanja (CEAI) Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu.., 2(10), 111-131.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3270
Teovanović P. O neinteligibilnosti rasizacije inteligencije. in Antropologija. 2010;2(10):111-131.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3270 .
Teovanović, Predrag, "O neinteligibilnosti rasizacije inteligencije" in Antropologija, 2, no. 10 (2010):111-131,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3270 .