dc.creator | Nikolić-Ristanović, Vesna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T13:44:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-17T13:44:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780190454524 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2871 | |
dc.description.abstract | Intergroup communication is an important aspect of dealing with intergroup conflicts in postconflict
societies, including countries of the former Yugoslavia. Widespread monolithic and
authoritarian communication is one of the main obstacles to constructive communication about
the past in the former Yugoslavia, and the challenges involved in shifting the nature of
communication, although rarely addressed and explored, seem to be a condition sine qua non of
effective reconciliation efforts. This should include contact and communication issues as well as
the very process through which the shift from authoritarian (one-way) communication, which
perpetuates conflicts, to inclusive (two-way) communication, which has reconciliatory potential,
can be achieved. Allport’s intergroup contact hypothesis, its revisions and further elaborations
in relation to the use of inclusive communication for overcoming divisions and reaching
reconciliation in post-conflict societies, as well as restorative and transformative justice
literature, including experiences of using yoga as part of restorative justice and reconciliation
programs, can serve as good theoretical departures.
As we explore communication as a way toward reconciliation in post-conflict societies using as
an illustration experiences from the former Yugoslavia, we need to be aware of intergroup
communication on the macro, meso, and micro level and its impact on reconciliation after the
armed conflicts of the 1990s. Conflicts on the macro level include conflicts between the states,
or on the level of the society, while meso-level conflicts are intergroup conflicts; micro-level
conflicts relate to interpersonal conflicts. Also we need to understand the scope and nature of
interethnic and other intercultural conflicts, as well as their socio-historical context and impact
on intergroup communication. Thus, addressing intergroup communication in a constructive and
inclusive way while dealing with the past and implementing reconciliation initiatives is
important. Intergroup communication initiatives that foster reconciliation in particular need to
be identified and explored, as examples of the practice of establishing inclusive communication
and binding people from different ethnic groups and those affected by armed conflicts in
different ways together. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | New York: Oxford University Press | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press USA | |
dc.source | U: H Giles & J Harwood (ur) The Oxford encyclopedia of intergroup communication | |
dc.subject | conflicts | |
dc.subject | intergroup communication | |
dc.subject | optimal contact | |
dc.subject | reconciliation | |
dc.subject | civil society | |
dc.subject | the former
Yugoslavia | |
dc.title | Intergroup Communication and Reconciliation: experiences from the Former Yugoslavia | en |
dc.type | conferenceObject | |
dc.rights.license | closedAccess | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.epage | 690 | |
dc.citation.other | https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-388 | |
dc.citation.rank | M14 | |
dc.citation.spage | 671 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/acrefo/9780190454524.001.0001 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.388 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/8805/bitstream_8805.pdf | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |