rFASPER - Repository of the Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   rFASPER
  • rFASPER
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications
  • View Item
  •   rFASPER
  • rFASPER
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Scientific literacy and the social constructivist perspective

Naučna pismenost i socio-konstruktivistička perspektiva

Thumbnail
2015
926.pdf (148.8Kb)
Authors
Antić, Slobodanka
Pešikan, Ana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The term scientific literacy is already common in our educational rhetoric. Although the term is widely used, there are no papers that analyse the definition of the term and the rangeitencompasses in Serbia. If scientific literacy is a necessary outcome of education, this analysis is an important base for designing the teaching/learning process which is intended to develop such an outcome. Therefore, this paper provides an analysis of the concept of scientific literacy (SL), the different viewpoints on SL and the nature of the concept. Furthermore, five key lines as courses of action in the teaching/learning process, necessary for the development of these competencies, are defined: appreciation ofstudents' previous knowledge, encouragement of students' basic functional literacy and reading comprehension skills, the development of students' understanding of the socio-cultural perspective on the origin and use of scientific knowledge and technological products, and practicing of scientif...ic research, either through school science or science applied in the context of cooperation between school and the local community, i.e. in the socio-cultural background where students live.

Termin naučna pismenost se već odomaćio u obrazovnoj retorici kod nas. Iako se termin uveliko koristi, kod nas nema radova koji se bave preispitivanjem njegovog određenja, šta on uključuje i na šta se tačno odnosi. Ova vrsta analize je neophodna, ako naučnu pismenost vidimo kao jedan od potrebnih ishoda obrazovanja, da bismo mogli kreirati nastavu/učenje koja omogućava realizaciju takvog ishoda. Zbog toga, u ovom radu se analizira konstrukt naučna pismenost, prikazuju različita gledišta o njemu i njegovoj prirodi, i definiše se pet ključnih linija, pravaca delovanja u nastavi/učenju, neophodnih za razvoj ove kompetencije: uvažavanje predznanja učenika; podsticanje bazične funkcionalne pismenosti učenika i veštine razumevanja pročitanog; podrška razvoju mišljenja učenika; razvoj razumevanja socio-kulturne perspektive nastanka i upotrebe naučnih znanja i tehnoloških produkata; i, posebno, praktikovanje naučno-istraživačkog rada, bilo kroz školsku nauku, ili nauku primenjenu u kontekstu s...aradnje škole i lokalne zajednice, dakle u socio-kulturnom miljeu u kome učenici žive.

Keywords:
scientific literacy / socio-constructivism / development of scientific literacyin school / teaching/learning methods / education / naučna pismenost / socio-konstruktivizam / razvoj naučne pismenostiu školi / metode nastave/učenja / obrazovanje
Source:
Psihološka istraživanja, 2015, 18, 1, 99-119
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Identification, measurement and development of the cognitive and emotional competences important for a Europe-oriented society (RS-179018)

DOI: 10.5937/PsIstra1501099A

ISSN: 0352-7379

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/929
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications
Institution/Community
rFASPER
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Antić, Slobodanka
AU  - Pešikan, Ana
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/929
AB  - The term scientific literacy is already common in our educational rhetoric. Although the term is widely used, there are no papers that analyse the definition of the term and the rangeitencompasses in Serbia. If scientific literacy is a necessary outcome of education, this analysis is an important base for designing the teaching/learning process which is intended to develop such an outcome. Therefore, this paper provides an analysis of the concept of scientific literacy (SL), the different viewpoints on SL and the nature of the concept. Furthermore, five key lines as courses of action in the teaching/learning process, necessary for the development of these competencies, are defined: appreciation ofstudents' previous knowledge, encouragement of students' basic functional literacy and reading comprehension skills, the development of students' understanding of the socio-cultural perspective on the origin and use of scientific knowledge and technological products, and practicing of scientific research, either through school science or science applied in the context of cooperation between school and the local community, i.e. in the socio-cultural background where students live.
AB  - Termin naučna pismenost se već odomaćio u obrazovnoj retorici kod nas. Iako se termin uveliko koristi, kod nas nema radova koji se bave preispitivanjem njegovog određenja, šta on uključuje i na šta se tačno odnosi. Ova vrsta analize je neophodna, ako naučnu pismenost vidimo kao jedan od potrebnih ishoda obrazovanja, da bismo mogli kreirati nastavu/učenje koja omogućava realizaciju takvog ishoda. Zbog toga, u ovom radu se analizira konstrukt naučna pismenost, prikazuju različita gledišta o njemu i njegovoj prirodi, i definiše se pet ključnih linija, pravaca delovanja u nastavi/učenju, neophodnih za razvoj ove kompetencije: uvažavanje predznanja učenika; podsticanje bazične funkcionalne pismenosti učenika i veštine razumevanja pročitanog; podrška razvoju mišljenja učenika; razvoj razumevanja socio-kulturne perspektive nastanka i upotrebe naučnih znanja i tehnoloških produkata; i, posebno, praktikovanje naučno-istraživačkog rada, bilo kroz školsku nauku, ili nauku primenjenu u kontekstu saradnje škole i lokalne zajednice, dakle u socio-kulturnom miljeu u kome učenici žive.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd
T2  - Psihološka istraživanja
T1  - Scientific literacy and the social constructivist perspective
T1  - Naučna pismenost i socio-konstruktivistička perspektiva
EP  - 119
IS  - 1
SP  - 99
VL  - 18
DO  - 10.5937/PsIstra1501099A
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Antić, Slobodanka and Pešikan, Ana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The term scientific literacy is already common in our educational rhetoric. Although the term is widely used, there are no papers that analyse the definition of the term and the rangeitencompasses in Serbia. If scientific literacy is a necessary outcome of education, this analysis is an important base for designing the teaching/learning process which is intended to develop such an outcome. Therefore, this paper provides an analysis of the concept of scientific literacy (SL), the different viewpoints on SL and the nature of the concept. Furthermore, five key lines as courses of action in the teaching/learning process, necessary for the development of these competencies, are defined: appreciation ofstudents' previous knowledge, encouragement of students' basic functional literacy and reading comprehension skills, the development of students' understanding of the socio-cultural perspective on the origin and use of scientific knowledge and technological products, and practicing of scientific research, either through school science or science applied in the context of cooperation between school and the local community, i.e. in the socio-cultural background where students live., Termin naučna pismenost se već odomaćio u obrazovnoj retorici kod nas. Iako se termin uveliko koristi, kod nas nema radova koji se bave preispitivanjem njegovog određenja, šta on uključuje i na šta se tačno odnosi. Ova vrsta analize je neophodna, ako naučnu pismenost vidimo kao jedan od potrebnih ishoda obrazovanja, da bismo mogli kreirati nastavu/učenje koja omogućava realizaciju takvog ishoda. Zbog toga, u ovom radu se analizira konstrukt naučna pismenost, prikazuju različita gledišta o njemu i njegovoj prirodi, i definiše se pet ključnih linija, pravaca delovanja u nastavi/učenju, neophodnih za razvoj ove kompetencije: uvažavanje predznanja učenika; podsticanje bazične funkcionalne pismenosti učenika i veštine razumevanja pročitanog; podrška razvoju mišljenja učenika; razvoj razumevanja socio-kulturne perspektive nastanka i upotrebe naučnih znanja i tehnoloških produkata; i, posebno, praktikovanje naučno-istraživačkog rada, bilo kroz školsku nauku, ili nauku primenjenu u kontekstu saradnje škole i lokalne zajednice, dakle u socio-kulturnom miljeu u kome učenici žive.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd",
journal = "Psihološka istraživanja",
title = "Scientific literacy and the social constructivist perspective, Naučna pismenost i socio-konstruktivistička perspektiva",
pages = "119-99",
number = "1",
volume = "18",
doi = "10.5937/PsIstra1501099A"
}
Antić, S.,& Pešikan, A.. (2015). Scientific literacy and the social constructivist perspective. in Psihološka istraživanja
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Institut za psihologiju, Beograd., 18(1), 99-119.
https://doi.org/10.5937/PsIstra1501099A
Antić S, Pešikan A. Scientific literacy and the social constructivist perspective. in Psihološka istraživanja. 2015;18(1):99-119.
doi:10.5937/PsIstra1501099A .
Antić, Slobodanka, Pešikan, Ana, "Scientific literacy and the social constructivist perspective" in Psihološka istraživanja, 18, no. 1 (2015):99-119,
https://doi.org/10.5937/PsIstra1501099A . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the rFASPER Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the rFASPER Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB