Приказ основних података о документу

dc.contributorNedović G.
dc.contributorEminović F.
dc.creatorAleksić, Vuk
dc.creatorRapaić, Dragan
dc.creatorPavlović, Dragan
dc.creatorMarinković, Dragan
dc.creatorĐurović, Branko
dc.creatorIlić, Rosanda
dc.creatorĐurović, Marko
dc.creatorCvrkota, Irena
dc.creatorRapaić, Marko
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T14:06:24Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T14:06:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-6203-139-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3252
dc.description.abstractPatients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) may have significant cognitive deficit and rehabilitation is based on the improvement of remaining abilities aiming to bring the person closer to premorbid profile. The aim of this study was to compare attention, memory and constructive-praxis state between healthy individuals and TBI patients before and after 4-weeks of special neurorehabilitation therapy. The experimental group (E) consisted of 15 patients with brain injury, while the control group (C) consisted of 15 healthy subjects. The assessment instruments were the subtests of "Attention" and "Memory" tests, and performed before and after the 4-weeks-therapy (focus, attention transfer, memory, and constructive practice therapy). Descriptive statistical methods and two-factor-analysis of variance was used as analytical statistical methods, where one factor represented group affiliation and the other was measurement (before and after therapy). The difference significance was determined at the level of error probability of type Ia = 0.05 (statistically significant difference p < 0.05, highly statistically significant difference p < 0.01). Results showed that all groups had 15 respondent (10 men, 5 women), ages between 15 and 18 years. In all tests high statistically significant difference between E and C group was found on the first measurement. Statistically significant difference between subjects of both groups on the second measurement was also found. High statistically significant difference of the E group on the first and second measurement was found. It can be said that applied therapies were effective. However, patients demonstrated lower score on tests after therapy than their healthy matches, indicating that four-week-therapy is not sufficient and should be continued.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversity of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation Publishing Center of the Faculty
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceApproaches and Models in Special Education and Rehabilitation – Thematic Collection of International Importance
dc.subjectneurorehabilitation
dc.subjectbrain injury
dc.subjectcognitive deficit
dc.titleNeurorehabilitation in patients with traumatic brain injuryen
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.rights.licenseBY-SA
dc.citation.epage327
dc.citation.other: 317-327
dc.citation.rankM14
dc.citation.spage317
dc.description.otherApproaches and Models in Special Education and Rehabilitation
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/3237/Rapaic.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_3252
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу