rFASPER - Repository of the Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   rFASPER
  • rFASPER
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications
  • View Item
  •   rFASPER
  • rFASPER
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Asperger syndrome: Diagnostic validity

Aspergerov sindrom - validnost dijagnostičkog koncepta

Thumbnail
2009
280.pdf (95.04Kb)
Authors
Milačić-Vidojević, Ivona
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This paper presents actual controversy regarding diagnosis, differential diagnosis and status of Asperger syndrome today. Reasons for support distinct diagnostic categories as well as spectrum notion of autism are discussed. There are differences across diagnostic systems including whether Asperger syndrome is used as a term to denote milder difficulties than autism, whether neuropsychological profiles are assumed to be important, wheather the nature of the social deficit is considered to be different to that in autism. Several emerging lines of data are suggestive of some differences from autism in predictions of outcome, co-morbidity with other psychiatric disorders, neuropsychological profiles, family genetics or response to treatment. They all would be potential external validaters if they were not used as part of selection criteria in the first place.
Ovaj rad pokazuje aktualne kontroverze u pogledu dijagnoze, diferencijalne dijagnoze i prirode Aspergerovog sindroma danas. Razmatraju se mogući razlozi za izdvajanje Aspergerovog sindroma kao posebnog kliničkog entiteta i razlozi za njegovo ostajanje u okviru spektra autističnog poremećaja. U sistemima dijagnostikovanja postoje razlike u pogledu odgovora na pitanje da li se termin Aspergerov sindrom koristi da označi blaže teškoće od onih kod autizma, da li se neuropsihološki profili smatraju značajnim i da li se pretpostavlja da se socijalni deficiti razlikuju kod Aspergerovog sindroma i autizma. Pojavljuje se nekoliko linija podatka koji sugerišu postojanje razlika između Aspergerovog sindroma i autizma, u pogledu predviđanja ishoda, komorbiditeta sa drugim psihijatrijskim poremećajima, neuropsiholoških profila, porodične genetike ili reagovanja na tretman. Ukoliko se ne koriste kao kriterijumi za selekciju ovi bi podaci mogli da posluže za empirijsku validaciju.
Keywords:
Asperger syndrome / diagnosis / differential diagnosis / Aspergerov sindrom / dijagnoza / diferencijalna dijagnoza
Source:
Engrami, 2009, 31, 3-4, 57-68
Publisher:
  • Klinički centar Srbije - Klinika za psihijatriju, Beograd i Udruženje psihijatara Srbije, Beograd

ISSN: 0351-2665

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_283
URI
http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/283
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications
Institution/Community
rFASPER
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milačić-Vidojević, Ivona
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/283
AB  - This paper presents actual controversy regarding diagnosis, differential diagnosis and status of Asperger syndrome today. Reasons for support distinct diagnostic categories as well as spectrum notion of autism are discussed. There are differences across diagnostic systems including whether Asperger syndrome is used as a term to denote milder difficulties than autism, whether neuropsychological profiles are assumed to be important, wheather the nature of the social deficit is considered to be different to that in autism. Several emerging lines of data are suggestive of some differences from autism in predictions of outcome, co-morbidity with other psychiatric disorders, neuropsychological profiles, family genetics or response to treatment. They all would be potential external validaters if they were not used as part of selection criteria in the first place.
AB  - Ovaj rad pokazuje aktualne kontroverze u pogledu dijagnoze, diferencijalne dijagnoze i prirode Aspergerovog sindroma danas. Razmatraju se mogući razlozi za izdvajanje Aspergerovog sindroma kao posebnog kliničkog entiteta i razlozi za njegovo ostajanje u okviru spektra autističnog poremećaja. U sistemima dijagnostikovanja postoje razlike u pogledu odgovora na pitanje da li se termin Aspergerov sindrom koristi da označi blaže teškoće od onih kod autizma, da li se neuropsihološki profili smatraju značajnim i da li se pretpostavlja da se socijalni deficiti razlikuju kod Aspergerovog sindroma i autizma. Pojavljuje se nekoliko linija podatka koji sugerišu postojanje razlika između Aspergerovog sindroma i autizma, u pogledu predviđanja ishoda, komorbiditeta sa drugim psihijatrijskim poremećajima, neuropsiholoških profila, porodične genetike ili reagovanja na tretman. Ukoliko se ne koriste kao kriterijumi za selekciju ovi bi podaci mogli da posluže za empirijsku validaciju.
PB  - Klinički centar Srbije - Klinika za psihijatriju, Beograd i Udruženje psihijatara Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Engrami
T1  - Asperger syndrome: Diagnostic validity
T1  - Aspergerov sindrom - validnost dijagnostičkog koncepta
EP  - 68
IS  - 3-4
SP  - 57
VL  - 31
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_283
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Milačić-Vidojević, Ivona",
year = "2009",
abstract = "This paper presents actual controversy regarding diagnosis, differential diagnosis and status of Asperger syndrome today. Reasons for support distinct diagnostic categories as well as spectrum notion of autism are discussed. There are differences across diagnostic systems including whether Asperger syndrome is used as a term to denote milder difficulties than autism, whether neuropsychological profiles are assumed to be important, wheather the nature of the social deficit is considered to be different to that in autism. Several emerging lines of data are suggestive of some differences from autism in predictions of outcome, co-morbidity with other psychiatric disorders, neuropsychological profiles, family genetics or response to treatment. They all would be potential external validaters if they were not used as part of selection criteria in the first place., Ovaj rad pokazuje aktualne kontroverze u pogledu dijagnoze, diferencijalne dijagnoze i prirode Aspergerovog sindroma danas. Razmatraju se mogući razlozi za izdvajanje Aspergerovog sindroma kao posebnog kliničkog entiteta i razlozi za njegovo ostajanje u okviru spektra autističnog poremećaja. U sistemima dijagnostikovanja postoje razlike u pogledu odgovora na pitanje da li se termin Aspergerov sindrom koristi da označi blaže teškoće od onih kod autizma, da li se neuropsihološki profili smatraju značajnim i da li se pretpostavlja da se socijalni deficiti razlikuju kod Aspergerovog sindroma i autizma. Pojavljuje se nekoliko linija podatka koji sugerišu postojanje razlika između Aspergerovog sindroma i autizma, u pogledu predviđanja ishoda, komorbiditeta sa drugim psihijatrijskim poremećajima, neuropsiholoških profila, porodične genetike ili reagovanja na tretman. Ukoliko se ne koriste kao kriterijumi za selekciju ovi bi podaci mogli da posluže za empirijsku validaciju.",
publisher = "Klinički centar Srbije - Klinika za psihijatriju, Beograd i Udruženje psihijatara Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Engrami",
title = "Asperger syndrome: Diagnostic validity, Aspergerov sindrom - validnost dijagnostičkog koncepta",
pages = "68-57",
number = "3-4",
volume = "31",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_283"
}
Milačić-Vidojević, I.. (2009). Asperger syndrome: Diagnostic validity. in Engrami
Klinički centar Srbije - Klinika za psihijatriju, Beograd i Udruženje psihijatara Srbije, Beograd., 31(3-4), 57-68.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_283
Milačić-Vidojević I. Asperger syndrome: Diagnostic validity. in Engrami. 2009;31(3-4):57-68.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_283 .
Milačić-Vidojević, Ivona, "Asperger syndrome: Diagnostic validity" in Engrami, 31, no. 3-4 (2009):57-68,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_283 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the rFASPER Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the rFASPER Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB