Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN m...odel. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct.
TY - JOUR
AU - Knežević, Goran
AU - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU - Purić, Danka
AU - Bosnjak, Michael
AU - Teovanović, Predrag
AU - Petrović, Boban
AU - Opačić, Goran
PY - 2019
UR - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1234
AB - Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN model. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct.
PB - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2 - Personality and Individual Differences
T1 - Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
EP - 164
SP - 155
VL - 143
DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009
ER -
@article{
author = "Knežević, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Bosnjak, Michael and Teovanović, Predrag and Petrović, Boban and Opačić, Goran",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN model. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis",
pages = "164-155",
volume = "143",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009"
}
Knežević, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Bosnjak, M., Teovanović, P., Petrović, B.,& Opačić, G.. (2019). Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 143, 155-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009
Knežević G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Bosnjak M, Teovanović P, Petrović B, Opačić G. Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;143:155-164.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009 .
Knežević, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Bosnjak, Michael, Teovanović, Predrag, Petrović, Boban, Opačić, Goran, "Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis" in Personality and Individual Differences, 143 (2019):155-164,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009 . .
