Приказ основних података о документу
Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.creator | Knežević, Goran | |
dc.creator | Lazarević, Ljiljana B. | |
dc.creator | Purić, Danka | |
dc.creator | Bosnjak, Michael | |
dc.creator | Teovanović, Predrag | |
dc.creator | Petrović, Boban | |
dc.creator | Opačić, Goran | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-09T14:29:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-09T14:29:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0191-8869 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1234 | |
dc.description.abstract | Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN model. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct. | en |
dc.publisher | Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford | |
dc.rights | restrictedAccess | |
dc.source | Personality and Individual Differences | |
dc.subject | Eysenck's PEN model | en |
dc.subject | Psychosis-proneness | en |
dc.subject | Schizotypy | en |
dc.subject | Disintegration | en |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | en |
dc.title | Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.epage | 164 | |
dc.citation.other | 143: 155-164 | |
dc.citation.rank | M22 | |
dc.citation.spage | 155 | |
dc.citation.volume | 143 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85062221775 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 000462420000023 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |