Maloletnici bez roditeljskog staranja kojima su izrečene vaspitne mere

Abstract

Uvod: Rezultati inostranih istraživanja pokazuju da više od trećine maloletnika bez roditeljskog staranja dolazi u kontakt sa sistemom maloletničkog pravosuđa. Empirijski nalazi o njihovim iskustvima, potrebama i razvojnim ishodima sugerišu postojanje značajnih razlika u odnosu na maloletnike uključene

u samo jedan sistem. Cilj: Ovo istraživanje ima za cilj utvrđivanje razlika u individualnim karakteristikama i istoriji domskog smeštaja između maloletnika bez roditeljskog staranja i drugih maloletnika kojima su izrečene vaspitne mere. Metode: Uzorak čine svi korisnici sa izrečenom vaspitnom merom koji su bili

na smeštaju u Zavodu za vaspitanje dece i omladine Beograd u periodu 2018– 2022. godinе (N = 25). Korisnici iz uzorka su oba pola (muški 68.0%), uzrasta

14–19 godina

(AS = 16,66, SD = 1,21), a 40.0% je bez roditeljskog staranja. Potrebni podaci prikupljeni su analizom službene dokumentacije. Rezultati: Prema većini ispitivanih varijabli, nema značajnih razlika između maloletnika bez roditeljskog staranja i drugih korisnika sa izrečenom vaspitnom merom. Ove dve grupe se značajno razlikuju prema polu (χ 2 = 6,00, df = 1, p < .05), učestalosti mentalnih poremećaja (χ 2 = 4,57, df = 1, p < .05) i načinu otpusta (χ 2 = 6,25, df = 1, p < .05). Zaključak: Maloletnici bez roditeljskog staranja sa izrečenom vaspitnom merom

zaslužuju posebnu pažnju zbog povećane izloženosti rizičnim faktorima koji su povezani sa recidivizmom. Nalazi ovog istraživanja mogu da doprinesu razvoju efektivnijih programa prevencije i tretmana za ovu grupu maloletnih prestupnika.

Introduction: The results of international research show that more than a third of minors without parental care come into contact with the juvenile justice system. Empirical findings about their experiences, needs and developmental outcomes suggest the existence of significant differences compared to minors included in only one system. Aim: This research aims to determine the differences in individual characteristics and history of home placement between minors without parental care and other minors who have been subjected to educational measures. Methods: The sample consists of all users who have been subjected to educational measures and were housed in the Institute for the Education of Children and Youth Belgrade in the period 2018–2022 (N = 25). The users in the sample are of both sexes (male 68.0%), aged 14–19 years (AS = 16.66, SD = 1.21), and 40.0% are without parental care. The required data were collected by analyzing official documentation. Results: For most of the examined variables, no significant differences were found between minors without parental care and other users who have been subjected to educational measures. These two groups differ significantly according to gender (χ 2

= 6.00, df = 1, p < .05), the frequency of mental disorders (χ 2

= 4.57, df = 1, p < .05) and type of exit (χ 2 = 6.25, df = 1, p < .05). Conclusion: Minors without parental care who have been subjected to educational measures deserve special attention due to their increased exposure to risk factors associated with recidivism. The findings of this research can contribute to the development of more effective prevention and treatment programs for this group of juvenile offenders.