Zakon o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici – ograničenja i rizici

Abstract

U radu će biti predstavljena kritička analiza novousvojenog Zakona o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici. Analizirajući pojmovnu problematiku, kao i okvir primene predmetnog zakona autori će pokušati da ukažu na manjkavosti postojećeg legislativnog rešenja. Takođe, pokušaće da ukažu da primena hitnih mera zaštite može dovesti do paradoksalnih efekata u smislu podsticanja unutarporodičnog nasilja. Pored upućivanja na određene procesne probleme, kao i nelogičnosti koje se tiču Centralne evidencije, a koja se predviđa ovim zakonom, autori će u konačnom pokušati da ukažu na neefikasnost represivnog pristupa. U tom smislu, otvoriće se ideja ka tretmanskim opcijama kao efektivnijem modelu društvenog reagovanja.

This paper will present a critical analysis of the newly adopted Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence. Analyzing the conceptual issues, as well as the implementation framework of the law authors will try to point out the deficiencies of the existing legislative solutions. Also, autors will try to point out that the implementation of emergency protective measures can lead to paradoxical effects in terms of encouraging domestic violence. In addition to the references to certain procedural problems and lack of logic concerning the Central Records, which is determined by this law, the authors will ultimately try to point out the ineffectiveness of the repressive approach. In this sense, the idea to open treatment options as a more effective model of social reaction.