Formalni i suštinski faktori u primeni uslovnog otpusta
Formal and crucial factors in use of the conditional release from prison
Konferencijski prilog (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
Autori ilustruju teorijske koncepte, formalne uslove i suštinsku primenu
uslovnog otpusta kroz penalnu praksu u Srbiji. Uočena je dominacija formalnih
elemenata u odlukama sudova, povodom molbi osuđenih za dodelu
uslovnog otpusta. Uočena je razlika u predlozima zatvorskih uprava, nasuprot
odluka suda povodom tog predloga. Naglašeno je odsustvo standardizovanih
instrumenata u proceni rizika i potreba osuđenih lica. Generalno,
uslovni otpust se retko dodeljuje. Saradnja državnih institucija povodom
uslovnog otpusta je formalnog karaktera. Ne postoje institucionalne forme
postpenalnog prihvata i tretmana uslovno otpuštenih osoba. Nema kontrole
ponašanja osuđenih tokom uslovnog otpusta. Nema evaluacije efekata
uslovnog otpusta. Predlaže se sistemska reforma u procesu razmatranja i
odlučivanja o uslovnom otpustu, uvođenje standardizovanih instrumenata
procene rizika i potreba osuđenih lica, formiranje posebnih službi za postpenalni
tretman i kvalitetnija saradnja državnih organ...a.
The authors illustrate the theoretical framework of the formal requirements
and meaningful implementation of conditional release in penitentiary practice
in Serbia. From a sample of 6000 applications submitted from 20 prisons, during
the two previous years, it was observed that certain formal elements in the
decisions of the courts, regarding the request for granting the conditonal release,
were dominant. The observed differences between the proposals of the prisons’
administration as opposed to a court decision regarding the proposal were
considered. There was an emphasis on the lack of standardized tools to assess
risks and needs of offenders. In general, conditional release is rarely granted.
Duration of conditional release is not a corrective element in the treatment of
convicted persons. The cooperation of state institutions regarding conditional
release is formal. There are no institutional forms of post-penal care, conditional
release and evaluation of the effects of... conditional release. A reform of the
system of considering and deciding parole is presented, including the practical
use of standardized risk assessment instruments and needs of offender. It is also
proposed that special services for postpenal treatment and quality cooperation of
the authorities is established.
Ključne reči:
uslovni otpust / zatvor / korekcija / tretman / conditional release / prison / correction / treatmentIzvor:
Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010, 2010, 529-546Izdavač:
- Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
Institucija/grupa
rFASPERTY - CONF AU - Ilić, Zoran AU - Jovanić, Goran PY - 2010 UR - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1795 AB - Autori ilustruju teorijske koncepte, formalne uslove i suštinsku primenu uslovnog otpusta kroz penalnu praksu u Srbiji. Uočena je dominacija formalnih elemenata u odlukama sudova, povodom molbi osuđenih za dodelu uslovnog otpusta. Uočena je razlika u predlozima zatvorskih uprava, nasuprot odluka suda povodom tog predloga. Naglašeno je odsustvo standardizovanih instrumenata u proceni rizika i potreba osuđenih lica. Generalno, uslovni otpust se retko dodeljuje. Saradnja državnih institucija povodom uslovnog otpusta je formalnog karaktera. Ne postoje institucionalne forme postpenalnog prihvata i tretmana uslovno otpuštenih osoba. Nema kontrole ponašanja osuđenih tokom uslovnog otpusta. Nema evaluacije efekata uslovnog otpusta. Predlaže se sistemska reforma u procesu razmatranja i odlučivanja o uslovnom otpustu, uvođenje standardizovanih instrumenata procene rizika i potreba osuđenih lica, formiranje posebnih službi za postpenalni tretman i kvalitetnija saradnja državnih organa. AB - The authors illustrate the theoretical framework of the formal requirements and meaningful implementation of conditional release in penitentiary practice in Serbia. From a sample of 6000 applications submitted from 20 prisons, during the two previous years, it was observed that certain formal elements in the decisions of the courts, regarding the request for granting the conditonal release, were dominant. The observed differences between the proposals of the prisons’ administration as opposed to a court decision regarding the proposal were considered. There was an emphasis on the lack of standardized tools to assess risks and needs of offenders. In general, conditional release is rarely granted. Duration of conditional release is not a corrective element in the treatment of convicted persons. The cooperation of state institutions regarding conditional release is formal. There are no institutional forms of post-penal care, conditional release and evaluation of the effects of conditional release. A reform of the system of considering and deciding parole is presented, including the practical use of standardized risk assessment instruments and needs of offender. It is also proposed that special services for postpenal treatment and quality cooperation of the authorities is established. PB - Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation C3 - Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010 T1 - Formalni i suštinski faktori u primeni uslovnog otpusta T1 - Formal and crucial factors in use of the conditional release from prison EP - 546 SP - 529 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_1795 ER -
@conference{ author = "Ilić, Zoran and Jovanić, Goran", year = "2010", abstract = "Autori ilustruju teorijske koncepte, formalne uslove i suštinsku primenu uslovnog otpusta kroz penalnu praksu u Srbiji. Uočena je dominacija formalnih elemenata u odlukama sudova, povodom molbi osuđenih za dodelu uslovnog otpusta. Uočena je razlika u predlozima zatvorskih uprava, nasuprot odluka suda povodom tog predloga. Naglašeno je odsustvo standardizovanih instrumenata u proceni rizika i potreba osuđenih lica. Generalno, uslovni otpust se retko dodeljuje. Saradnja državnih institucija povodom uslovnog otpusta je formalnog karaktera. Ne postoje institucionalne forme postpenalnog prihvata i tretmana uslovno otpuštenih osoba. Nema kontrole ponašanja osuđenih tokom uslovnog otpusta. Nema evaluacije efekata uslovnog otpusta. Predlaže se sistemska reforma u procesu razmatranja i odlučivanja o uslovnom otpustu, uvođenje standardizovanih instrumenata procene rizika i potreba osuđenih lica, formiranje posebnih službi za postpenalni tretman i kvalitetnija saradnja državnih organa., The authors illustrate the theoretical framework of the formal requirements and meaningful implementation of conditional release in penitentiary practice in Serbia. From a sample of 6000 applications submitted from 20 prisons, during the two previous years, it was observed that certain formal elements in the decisions of the courts, regarding the request for granting the conditonal release, were dominant. The observed differences between the proposals of the prisons’ administration as opposed to a court decision regarding the proposal were considered. There was an emphasis on the lack of standardized tools to assess risks and needs of offenders. In general, conditional release is rarely granted. Duration of conditional release is not a corrective element in the treatment of convicted persons. The cooperation of state institutions regarding conditional release is formal. There are no institutional forms of post-penal care, conditional release and evaluation of the effects of conditional release. A reform of the system of considering and deciding parole is presented, including the practical use of standardized risk assessment instruments and needs of offender. It is also proposed that special services for postpenal treatment and quality cooperation of the authorities is established.", publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation", journal = "Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010", title = "Formalni i suštinski faktori u primeni uslovnog otpusta, Formal and crucial factors in use of the conditional release from prison", pages = "546-529", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_1795" }
Ilić, Z.,& Jovanić, G.. (2010). Formalni i suštinski faktori u primeni uslovnog otpusta. in Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010 Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation., 529-546. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_1795
Ilić Z, Jovanić G. Formalni i suštinski faktori u primeni uslovnog otpusta. in Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010. 2010;:529-546. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_1795 .
Ilić, Zoran, Jovanić, Goran, "Formalni i suštinski faktori u primeni uslovnog otpusta" in Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010 (2010):529-546, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_1795 .