This paper is financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (No. 451-03-47/2023-01/200096).

Link to this page

This paper is financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (No. 451-03-47/2023-01/200096).

Authors

Publications

Differences in Social Knowledge Between Persons with Intellectual Disability and Persons with Dual Diagnoses

Mastilo, Bojana; Đorđević, Mirjana; Glumbić, Nenad; Memišević, Haris; Pejović-Milovančević, Milica

(Taylor & Francis, 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mastilo, Bojana
AU  - Đorđević, Mirjana
AU  - Glumbić, Nenad
AU  - Memišević, Haris
AU  - Pejović-Milovančević, Milica
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5309
AB  - Introduction
Social knowledge is an important aspect of social cognition that pertains to broader knowledge of social concepts and norms. People with intellectual disabilities are more likely to experience mental health challenges, and it’s important to pay special attention to how comorbid conditions can affect their social cognition skills, potentially weakening these skills. Consequently, the present study seeks to compare social knowledge between two groups of adults in Bosnia and Herzegovina: those with intellectual disabilities and those diagnosed with a dual diagnosis encompassing intellectual disability and psychiatric conditions. An additional goal was to identify the factors contributing to social knowledge in these groups.
Methods
The study sample included 62 adults with mild intellectual disability, divided into two groups based on their comorbid psychiatric condition. We used a demographic questionnaire, Raven’s Progressive Matrices, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT), MINI PAS – ADD scale, and The Social Knowledge Test to assess social knowledge and intellectual functioning. We compared the social knowledge scores between the two groups and identified the predictors of social knowledge in each group.
Results
The results indicated that adult participants with dual diagnoses had lower social knowledge scores than those with intellectual disabilities only, even after controlling for intellectual functioning and verbal abilities. The predictors of social knowledge differed between the two groups, with age being the only statistically significant predictor in both groups. In individuals with intellectual disabilities, age and the presence of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms were important predictors of social knowledge, while in the group of participants with dual diagnoses, age and PPVT were significant predictors of social knowledge.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of social knowledge in individuals with intellectual disabilities and dual diagnoses. The findings suggest that individuals with dual diagnoses may have a specific deficit in social knowledge that is not fully explained by their intellectual functioning or verbal abilities. Clinicians and educators should focus on identifying and addressing social knowledge deficits in individuals with dual diagnoses to improve their overall social functioning.
PB  - Taylor & Francis
T2  - Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
T1  - Differences in Social Knowledge Between Persons with Intellectual Disability and Persons with Dual Diagnoses
DO  - 10.1080/19315864.2023.2285038
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mastilo, Bojana and Đorđević, Mirjana and Glumbić, Nenad and Memišević, Haris and Pejović-Milovančević, Milica",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Introduction
Social knowledge is an important aspect of social cognition that pertains to broader knowledge of social concepts and norms. People with intellectual disabilities are more likely to experience mental health challenges, and it’s important to pay special attention to how comorbid conditions can affect their social cognition skills, potentially weakening these skills. Consequently, the present study seeks to compare social knowledge between two groups of adults in Bosnia and Herzegovina: those with intellectual disabilities and those diagnosed with a dual diagnosis encompassing intellectual disability and psychiatric conditions. An additional goal was to identify the factors contributing to social knowledge in these groups.
Methods
The study sample included 62 adults with mild intellectual disability, divided into two groups based on their comorbid psychiatric condition. We used a demographic questionnaire, Raven’s Progressive Matrices, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT), MINI PAS – ADD scale, and The Social Knowledge Test to assess social knowledge and intellectual functioning. We compared the social knowledge scores between the two groups and identified the predictors of social knowledge in each group.
Results
The results indicated that adult participants with dual diagnoses had lower social knowledge scores than those with intellectual disabilities only, even after controlling for intellectual functioning and verbal abilities. The predictors of social knowledge differed between the two groups, with age being the only statistically significant predictor in both groups. In individuals with intellectual disabilities, age and the presence of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms were important predictors of social knowledge, while in the group of participants with dual diagnoses, age and PPVT were significant predictors of social knowledge.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of social knowledge in individuals with intellectual disabilities and dual diagnoses. The findings suggest that individuals with dual diagnoses may have a specific deficit in social knowledge that is not fully explained by their intellectual functioning or verbal abilities. Clinicians and educators should focus on identifying and addressing social knowledge deficits in individuals with dual diagnoses to improve their overall social functioning.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities",
title = "Differences in Social Knowledge Between Persons with Intellectual Disability and Persons with Dual Diagnoses",
doi = "10.1080/19315864.2023.2285038"
}
Mastilo, B., Đorđević, M., Glumbić, N., Memišević, H.,& Pejović-Milovančević, M.. (2023). Differences in Social Knowledge Between Persons with Intellectual Disability and Persons with Dual Diagnoses. in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Taylor & Francis..
https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2023.2285038
Mastilo B, Đorđević M, Glumbić N, Memišević H, Pejović-Milovančević M. Differences in Social Knowledge Between Persons with Intellectual Disability and Persons with Dual Diagnoses. in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2023;.
doi:10.1080/19315864.2023.2285038 .
Mastilo, Bojana, Đorđević, Mirjana, Glumbić, Nenad, Memišević, Haris, Pejović-Milovančević, Milica, "Differences in Social Knowledge Between Persons with Intellectual Disability and Persons with Dual Diagnoses" in Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2023.2285038 . .
1
1

Parents' priorities in choosing treatment options for children with autism -perspectives from Serbia

Đorđević, Mirjana; Glumbić, Nenad; Memišević, Haris; Brojčin, Branislav; Golubović, Špela

(Taylor and Francis Group [Commercial Publisher] Taylor and Francis [Imprint], 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Mirjana
AU  - Glumbić, Nenad
AU  - Memišević, Haris
AU  - Brojčin, Branislav
AU  - Golubović, Špela
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5138
AB  - Parents are essential members of the multidisciplinary teams supporting children with autism. Examining parents’ priorities in the field of treatment options for children with autism can be very helpful to educators and therapists in the selection of appropriate treatments. The goal of the present study was to explore the treatment priorities which parents may have for their children with autism in Serbia. Another goal was to examine the relationship between parents’ priorities and children’s current level of functioning. The sample for this study consisted of 141 parents who completed The survey of treatment priorities. The results showed that parents ranked as their highest priorities the areas of Communication Skills, Community Living, and Social Relationships. These findings can help educators and therapists create treatment plans for children with autism that are aligned with parents’ priorities.
PB  - Taylor and Francis Group [Commercial Publisher] Taylor and Francis [Imprint]
T2  - International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
T1  - Parents' priorities in choosing treatment options for children with autism -perspectives from Serbia
EP  - 8
SP  - 1
DO  - DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2200299
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Đorđević, Mirjana and Glumbić, Nenad and Memišević, Haris and Brojčin, Branislav and Golubović, Špela",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Parents are essential members of the multidisciplinary teams supporting children with autism. Examining parents’ priorities in the field of treatment options for children with autism can be very helpful to educators and therapists in the selection of appropriate treatments. The goal of the present study was to explore the treatment priorities which parents may have for their children with autism in Serbia. Another goal was to examine the relationship between parents’ priorities and children’s current level of functioning. The sample for this study consisted of 141 parents who completed The survey of treatment priorities. The results showed that parents ranked as their highest priorities the areas of Communication Skills, Community Living, and Social Relationships. These findings can help educators and therapists create treatment plans for children with autism that are aligned with parents’ priorities.",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Group [Commercial Publisher] Taylor and Francis [Imprint]",
journal = "International Journal of Developmental Disabilities",
title = "Parents' priorities in choosing treatment options for children with autism -perspectives from Serbia",
pages = "8-1",
doi = "DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2200299"
}
Đorđević, M., Glumbić, N., Memišević, H., Brojčin, B.,& Golubović, Š.. (2023). Parents' priorities in choosing treatment options for children with autism -perspectives from Serbia. in International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
Taylor and Francis Group [Commercial Publisher] Taylor and Francis [Imprint]., 1-8.
https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2200299
Đorđević M, Glumbić N, Memišević H, Brojčin B, Golubović Š. Parents' priorities in choosing treatment options for children with autism -perspectives from Serbia. in International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. 2023;:1-8.
doi:DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2200299 .
Đorđević, Mirjana, Glumbić, Nenad, Memišević, Haris, Brojčin, Branislav, Golubović, Špela, "Parents' priorities in choosing treatment options for children with autism -perspectives from Serbia" in International Journal of Developmental Disabilities (2023):1-8,
https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2200299 . .