Stasević-Karličić, Ivana

Link to this page

http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/APP/faces/author.xhtml?author_id=24d77a5b-3879-4a86-95fa-ee34f230a760&item_offset=0&project_offset=0&sort_by=dc.date.issued
Authority KeyName Variants
24d77a5b-3879-4a86-95fa-ee34f230a760
  • Stasević-Karličić, Ivana (2)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Psychometric evaluation and validation of the Serbian version of "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test

Đordević, Jelena; Živanović, Marko; Pavlović, Aleksandra M.; Mihajlović, Goran; Stasević-Karličić, Ivana; Pavlović, Dragan

(Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd, 2017) 

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đordević, Jelena
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandra M.
AU  - Mihajlović, Goran
AU  - Stasević-Karličić, Ivana
AU  - Pavlović, Dragan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1075
AB  - "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test (RMET) is one of the most popular and widely used measures of individual differences in Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities. Despite demonstrating good validity in differentiating various clinical groups exhibiting ToM deficits from unimpaired controls, previous studies raised the question of the RMET's homogeneity, latent structure, and reliability. The aim of this study is to provide evidence on psychometric properties, latent structure, and validity of the newly adapted Serbian version of the RMET. In total, 260 participants (61.9% females) took part in the study. The sample consisted of both unimpaired controls (76.5%), and a clinical group of participants that are believed to demonstrate ToM deficits (23.5%), namely, persons diagnosed with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (54.1% females). RMET has demonstrated fair psychometric properties (KMO=.723; alpha=.747; H1=.076; H5=.465), successfully differentiating between clinical group and control [F (1,254)=26.175, p  lt . 001, eta(2)(p) =.093], while typical gender differences in performance were found only in control group. Tests of several models based on the previous literature revealed that the affect-specific factors underlying performance on RMET demonstrate poor fit. The best fitting model obtained included reduced scale with a single-factor underlying the test's performance (TLI=.953, CFI=.958, RMSEA=.020). Based on the fit parameters we propose 18-item short-form of the Serbian version of RMET (KMO=.797; alpha=.728; H1=.129; H5=.677) for economic, reliable and valid measurement of ToM abilities.
PB  - Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Psihologija
T1  - Psychometric evaluation and validation of the Serbian version of "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test
EP  - 502
IS  - 4
SP  - 483
VL  - 50
DO  - 10.2298/PSI170504010D
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Đordević, Jelena and Živanović, Marko and Pavlović, Aleksandra M. and Mihajlović, Goran and Stasević-Karličić, Ivana and Pavlović, Dragan",
year = "2017",
abstract = ""Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test (RMET) is one of the most popular and widely used measures of individual differences in Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities. Despite demonstrating good validity in differentiating various clinical groups exhibiting ToM deficits from unimpaired controls, previous studies raised the question of the RMET's homogeneity, latent structure, and reliability. The aim of this study is to provide evidence on psychometric properties, latent structure, and validity of the newly adapted Serbian version of the RMET. In total, 260 participants (61.9% females) took part in the study. The sample consisted of both unimpaired controls (76.5%), and a clinical group of participants that are believed to demonstrate ToM deficits (23.5%), namely, persons diagnosed with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (54.1% females). RMET has demonstrated fair psychometric properties (KMO=.723; alpha=.747; H1=.076; H5=.465), successfully differentiating between clinical group and control [F (1,254)=26.175, p  lt . 001, eta(2)(p) =.093], while typical gender differences in performance were found only in control group. Tests of several models based on the previous literature revealed that the affect-specific factors underlying performance on RMET demonstrate poor fit. The best fitting model obtained included reduced scale with a single-factor underlying the test's performance (TLI=.953, CFI=.958, RMSEA=.020). Based on the fit parameters we propose 18-item short-form of the Serbian version of RMET (KMO=.797; alpha=.728; H1=.129; H5=.677) for economic, reliable and valid measurement of ToM abilities.",
publisher = "Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Psihologija",
title = "Psychometric evaluation and validation of the Serbian version of "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test",
pages = "502-483",
number = "4",
volume = "50",
doi = "10.2298/PSI170504010D"
}
Đordević, J., Živanović, M., Pavlović, A. M., Mihajlović, G., Stasević-Karličić, I.,& Pavlović, D.. (2017). Psychometric evaluation and validation of the Serbian version of "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test. in Psihologija
Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd., 50(4), 483-502.
https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170504010D
Đordević J, Živanović M, Pavlović AM, Mihajlović G, Stasević-Karličić I, Pavlović D. Psychometric evaluation and validation of the Serbian version of "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test. in Psihologija. 2017;50(4):483-502.
doi:10.2298/PSI170504010D .
Đordević, Jelena, Živanović, Marko, Pavlović, Aleksandra M., Mihajlović, Goran, Stasević-Karličić, Ivana, Pavlović, Dragan, "Psychometric evaluation and validation of the Serbian version of "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test" in Psihologija, 50, no. 4 (2017):483-502,
https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170504010D . .
8
2
7

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: the diagnostic dilemma

Stasević-Karličić, Ivana; Đorđević, Jelena; Stasević, Milena; Đukic-Dejanović, Slavica; Pavlović, Dragan; Janković, Slobodan M.

(Academy Publisher, 2016) 

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Stasević-Karličić, Ivana
AU  - Đorđević, Jelena
AU  - Stasević, Milena
AU  - Đukic-Dejanović, Slavica
AU  - Pavlović, Dragan
AU  - Janković, Slobodan M.
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1029
PB  - Academy Publisher
T2  - Open Journal of Psychiatry and Allied Sciences
T1  - Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: the diagnostic dilemma
EP  - 165
IS  - 2
SP  - 162
VL  - 7
DO  - 10.5958/2394-2061.2016.00028.8
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Stasević-Karličić, Ivana and Đorđević, Jelena and Stasević, Milena and Đukic-Dejanović, Slavica and Pavlović, Dragan and Janković, Slobodan M.",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Academy Publisher",
journal = "Open Journal of Psychiatry and Allied Sciences",
title = "Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: the diagnostic dilemma",
pages = "165-162",
number = "2",
volume = "7",
doi = "10.5958/2394-2061.2016.00028.8"
}
Stasević-Karličić, I., Đorđević, J., Stasević, M., Đukic-Dejanović, S., Pavlović, D.,& Janković, S. M.. (2016). Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: the diagnostic dilemma. in Open Journal of Psychiatry and Allied Sciences
Academy Publisher., 7(2), 162-165.
https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-2061.2016.00028.8
Stasević-Karličić I, Đorđević J, Stasević M, Đukic-Dejanović S, Pavlović D, Janković SM. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: the diagnostic dilemma. in Open Journal of Psychiatry and Allied Sciences. 2016;7(2):162-165.
doi:10.5958/2394-2061.2016.00028.8 .
Stasević-Karličić, Ivana, Đorđević, Jelena, Stasević, Milena, Đukic-Dejanović, Slavica, Pavlović, Dragan, Janković, Slobodan M., "Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: the diagnostic dilemma" in Open Journal of Psychiatry and Allied Sciences, 7, no. 2 (2016):162-165,
https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-2061.2016.00028.8 . .