Jačova Zora

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
1cac1a75-5ee4-48ee-86af-5cc1344881b9
  • Jačova Zora (1)
  • Jačova, Zora (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Phoneme recognition and confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss

Jačova Zora; Ristovska, L.; Kovačević Jasmina; Krasniqi, N.

(Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju [University Publisher], 2023)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jačova Zora
AU  - Ristovska, L.
AU  - Kovačević Jasmina
AU  - Krasniqi, N.
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5159
AB  - Hearing impaired listeners show different phoneme confusions during speech recognition testing. The aim of the study was to analyze phoneme recognition in patients with sensorineural hearing loss during word recognition testing with monosyllable words, as well as, to compare consonant confusions in different vowel context. Recognition of 18 initial and final consonants was analyzed in a total of 698 presentations of the words. There were 1154 (82.7%) correct recognitions and 100 consonant confusions (7.2%). The patients did not response at a total of 71 presentations of the words which means that consonants in 142 cases (10.2%) were not recognized, nor confused. There are no consonant confusion patterns during suprathreshold testing with real words. In cases of phoneme confusions, listeners replace the stimulus word with another word from the lexical neighborhood. In terms of the vowel context, the consonants are the most easily identified in the context of the vowel /a/. © 2023, Institute for Human Rehabilitation. All rights reserved.
PB  - Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju [University Publisher]
T2  - Human Research in Rehabilitation
T1  - Phoneme recognition and confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss
EP  - 109
IS  - 1
SP  - 102
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.21554/hrr.042312
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jačova Zora and Ristovska, L. and Kovačević Jasmina and Krasniqi, N.",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Hearing impaired listeners show different phoneme confusions during speech recognition testing. The aim of the study was to analyze phoneme recognition in patients with sensorineural hearing loss during word recognition testing with monosyllable words, as well as, to compare consonant confusions in different vowel context. Recognition of 18 initial and final consonants was analyzed in a total of 698 presentations of the words. There were 1154 (82.7%) correct recognitions and 100 consonant confusions (7.2%). The patients did not response at a total of 71 presentations of the words which means that consonants in 142 cases (10.2%) were not recognized, nor confused. There are no consonant confusion patterns during suprathreshold testing with real words. In cases of phoneme confusions, listeners replace the stimulus word with another word from the lexical neighborhood. In terms of the vowel context, the consonants are the most easily identified in the context of the vowel /a/. © 2023, Institute for Human Rehabilitation. All rights reserved.",
publisher = "Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju [University Publisher]",
journal = "Human Research in Rehabilitation",
title = "Phoneme recognition and confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss",
pages = "109-102",
number = "1",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.21554/hrr.042312"
}
Jačova Zora, Ristovska, L., Kovačević Jasmina,& Krasniqi, N.. (2023). Phoneme recognition and confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. in Human Research in Rehabilitation
Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju [University Publisher]., 13(1), 102-109.
https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042312
Jačova Zora, Ristovska L, Kovačević Jasmina, Krasniqi N. Phoneme recognition and confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. in Human Research in Rehabilitation. 2023;13(1):102-109.
doi:10.21554/hrr.042312 .
Jačova Zora, Ristovska, L., Kovačević Jasmina, Krasniqi, N., "Phoneme recognition and confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss" in Human Research in Rehabilitation, 13, no. 1 (2023):102-109,
https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042312 . .

Correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds

Ristovska, Lidija; Jačova, Zora; Kovačević, Jasmina; Radovanović, Vesna; Hasanbegović, Husnija

(Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ristovska, Lidija
AU  - Jačova, Zora
AU  - Kovačević, Jasmina
AU  - Radovanović, Vesna
AU  - Hasanbegović, Husnija
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3663
AB  - Speech detection threshold (SDT) depends on audibility alone, whereas speech recognition threshold (SRT) requires the stimuli to be heard and identified. The aim of the study was to determine the difference between SDT and SRT, and to analyze the correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds. Difference between SDT and SRT was ≤ 12 dB in majority of cases (p = .018). SDT was strongly correlated with the best pure tone threshold. Pearson correlation coefficient was the highest in “Inverted U” shape (r = .99). There was strong correlation between SRT and PTA (500-2000), PTA (500-4000), and PTA (500-1000), especially in Rising configuration (r = .997, r = .992 r = .989, respectively), as well as, between SRT and frequency of 1000 Hz (r = .989). SRT is in the highest correlation with PTA (500, 1000, 2000 Hz) and with the hearing threshold at frequency of 1000 Hz. © 2021, Institute for Human Rehabilitation. All rights reserved.
PB  - Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju
T2  - Human Research in Rehabilitation
T1  - Correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds
EP  - 125
EP  - 
EP  - 
IS  - 2
SP  - 120
VL  - 11
DO  - 10.21554/hrr.092108
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ristovska, Lidija and Jačova, Zora and Kovačević, Jasmina and Radovanović, Vesna and Hasanbegović, Husnija",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Speech detection threshold (SDT) depends on audibility alone, whereas speech recognition threshold (SRT) requires the stimuli to be heard and identified. The aim of the study was to determine the difference between SDT and SRT, and to analyze the correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds. Difference between SDT and SRT was ≤ 12 dB in majority of cases (p = .018). SDT was strongly correlated with the best pure tone threshold. Pearson correlation coefficient was the highest in “Inverted U” shape (r = .99). There was strong correlation between SRT and PTA (500-2000), PTA (500-4000), and PTA (500-1000), especially in Rising configuration (r = .997, r = .992 r = .989, respectively), as well as, between SRT and frequency of 1000 Hz (r = .989). SRT is in the highest correlation with PTA (500, 1000, 2000 Hz) and with the hearing threshold at frequency of 1000 Hz. © 2021, Institute for Human Rehabilitation. All rights reserved.",
publisher = "Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju",
journal = "Human Research in Rehabilitation",
title = "Correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds",
pages = "125---120",
number = "2",
volume = "11",
doi = "10.21554/hrr.092108"
}
Ristovska, L., Jačova, Z., Kovačević, J., Radovanović, V.,& Hasanbegović, H.. (2021). Correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds. in Human Research in Rehabilitation
Institut za Humanu Rehabilitaciju., 11(2), 120-125.
https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092108
Ristovska L, Jačova Z, Kovačević J, Radovanović V, Hasanbegović H. Correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds. in Human Research in Rehabilitation. 2021;11(2):120-125.
doi:10.21554/hrr.092108 .
Ristovska, Lidija, Jačova, Zora, Kovačević, Jasmina, Radovanović, Vesna, Hasanbegović, Husnija, "Correlation between pure tone thresholds and speech thresholds" in Human Research in Rehabilitation, 11, no. 2 (2021):120-125,
https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092108 . .
3
2