@conference{
author = "Petrović, Vera and Maljković, Marija",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Uvod: Procena rizika recidivizma utiče na koncipiranje programa penalne
rehabilitacije, bezbednost osoblja, drugih osuđenih, osoba koje posećuju zatvor,
kao
i
društvene
zajednice
u
koju
se
prestupnik
najčešće
vraća.
Iako
su
razvojem
instrumenata procene rizika recidivizma napravljeni veliki pomaci
u odnosu na kliničku procenu, oni imaju određene manjkavosti, a primenom
najboljih instrumenata, pod uslovom da procenu vrši obučen službenik, može
se očekivati tačnost od oko 70%.
Cilj: Cilj ovog rada je analiza dostupnih istraživanja, te isticanje značaja obuke
osoblja za primenu instrumenata procene rizika recidivizma koji su u upotrebi
sa zatvorskom populacijom.
Metode: Za potrebe uvida u relevantne naučne izvore, korišćena je pretraga
elektronskih bibliografskih baza: KOBSON, Google Scholar, ResearchGate.
Rezultati: Analizom dostupnih radova utvrđeno je da je obuka ključna za
uspešnu primenu dinamičkih instrumenata, te da je u direktnoj vezi sa pitanjem
pouzdanosti
procene.
Pored
početne,
periodično
treba
vršiti
i
dodatne
obuke
osoblja,
jer
kontinuirana
obuka
smanjuje
mogućnost
da
subjektivni
stavovi
imaju
uticaj
na
procenu.
Takođe,
kontinuirana
obuka
omogućava
da
svi
zaposleni
na
isti
način
razumeju
kriterijume
za
procenu
i
da
poseduju
veštine
za
dosledno
korišćenje
instrumenta.
Međutim,
u
praksi
se
neretko
dešava
da
obuka
osoblja
izostane,
te
se
sprovodi
samo
kada
se
u
korektivnu
praksu
uvodi
novi
instrument.
Posledica
ovakve
prakse
je
da
pouzdanost
opada,
što
doprinosi
manjem
poverenju
u
procenu.
Rezultati
istraživanja
ukazuju
da
određen
broj
praktičara
izražava
sumnju
u
pouzdanost
instrumenata.
Razlog
za
to
je
činjenica da praktičari različito koriste instrument, jer nisu završili početnu ili
dodatnu obuku i ne proverava se da li se instrument koristi na odgovarajući
način. Tako se greške u proceni samo multiplikuju.Zaključak: Sve navedeno ukazuje na značaj početne i periodične dodatne obuke
osoblja.
Takođe,
na
osnovu
rezultata
istraživanja
zaključuje
se
da,
ukoliko
izostane
adekvatna
obuka
osoblja,
upotreba
dinamičkih
instrumenata
se
ne
preporučuje., ntroduction: Recidivism risk assessment affects the design of penal rehabilitation
programs, staff safety, other convicts, persons visiting the prison, as well as the social
community to which the offender most often returns. Although the development of recidivism
risk assessment instruments has made great progress compared to clinical assessment,
they have certain shortcomings, and by applying the best instruments, provided that the
assessment is performed by a trained officer, an accuracy of around 70% can be expected. Aim: The aim of this paper is to analyze the available research, and highlight the
importance of staff training for the application of recidivism risk assessment instruments
which are used on prison population.
Methods: For the purpose of gaining an insight into relevant scientific sources, the
following electronic bibliographical data bases were searched: KOBSON, Google Scholar,
ResearchGate.
Results: The analysis of the available papers found that training is key to the successful
application of dynamic instruments, and that it is directly related to the issue of assessment
reliability. In addition to the initial training, additional staff training should be carried out
periodically, because continuous training reduces the possibility that subjective attitudes have
an impact on the assessment. Also, continuous training allows all employees to understand the
assessment criteria in the same way and to have the skills to use the instrument consistently.
However, in practice, it often happens that staff training is missing, and it is carried out only
when a new instrument is introduced into the corrective practice. The consequence of this
practice is that reliability decreases, which contributes to less confidence in the assessment.
The research results indicate that a certain number of practitioners express doubts about
the reliability of the instruments. The reason for this is the fact that practitioners use the
instrument differently, because they have not completed initial or additional training and it is
not checked whether the instrument is used in an appropriate way. Thus, errors in assessment
only multiply.
Conclusion: All of the above points to the importance of initial and periodic additional
training of staff. Also, based on the results of the research, it is concluded that if there is no
adequate training of the staff, the use of dynamic instruments is not recommended.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation",
journal = "Zbornik radova - 12. Međunarodni naučni skup Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas Beograd, 27–28. oktobar 2023. Godine",
title = "Značaj obuke osoblja za primenu instrumenata procene rizika recidivizma osuđenih, The importance of staff training for the application of recidivism risk assessments of the convicted",
pages = "546-539",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_5379"
}
