TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692100146X
UR  - C:\Users\FASPER\Zotero\storage\CJP3LC96\Lazarević et al. - 2021 - What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our healt.pdf
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3744
AB  - The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality
SP  - 110771
VL  - 176
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality",
pages = "110771",
volume = "176",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771"
}

Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z.,& Knežević, G.. (2021). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 176, 110771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771

Lazarević LB, Purić D, Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Knežević G. What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;176:110771.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 .

Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Knežević, Goran, "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality" in Personality and Individual Differences, 176 (2021):110771,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1308
AB  - The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality
SP  - 110771
VL  - 176
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The study aimed to investigate the role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality in health-related behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., recommended health behaviors according to COVID-19 guidelines and engagement in pseudoscientific practices related to COVID-19. Basic personality space was defined by the HEXACO model complemented by Disintegration, which represents psychotic-like experiences and behaviors reconceptualized as a personality trait. Mediation analyses conducted on a convenient sample from the general population recruited via social media and by snowballing (N = 417) showed that engagement in pseudoscientific behaviors was predicted by high Disintegration. However, this relationship was entirely mediated by high experiential and low rational thinking styles. Adherence to health practices recommended by COVID-19 guidelines was predicted by high Honesty traits, while low Disintegration had both direct and indirect effects through conspiracy mentality.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality",
pages = "110771",
volume = "176",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771"
}

Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z.,& Knežević, G.. (2021). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 176, 110771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771

Lazarević LB, Purić D, Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Knežević G. What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2021;176:110771.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 .

Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Knežević, Goran, "What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality" in Personality and Individual Differences, 176 (2021):110771,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Bosnjak, Michael
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Petrović, Boban
AU  - Opačić, Goran
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1234
AB  - Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN model. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis
EP  - 164
SP  - 155
VL  - 143
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Knežević, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Bosnjak, Michael and Teovanović, Predrag and Petrović, Boban and Opačić, Goran",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Eysenck's model of personality (PEN) was one of the most influential personality models in the 20th century. A unique characteristic of this model is the claim of psychosis-proneness being incorporated into it as one of its three basic traits - Psychoticism. The main goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to find out the associations between PEN traits and a diverse set of operationalizations of psychosis-proneness (PP). We set the benchmark for assuming their distinctness to a correlation coefficient amounting to 0.40. A systematic review has been conducted, yielding 350 correlations of interest. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients, we found the following associations between psychosis-proneness and Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism, respectively: 0.21, -0.09, and 0.30. All prediction intervals around the three mean effect sizes do include zero, suggesting that psychosis-proneness is only marginally captured by the PEN model. Moderator analyses further demonstrated this distinctness and the lack of phenotypic validity of the Psychoticism scale/construct.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis",
pages = "164-155",
volume = "143",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009"
}

Knežević, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Bosnjak, M., Teovanović, P., Petrović, B.,& Opačić, G.. (2019). Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 143, 155-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009

Knežević G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Bosnjak M, Teovanović P, Petrović B, Opačić G. Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;143:155-164.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009 .

Knežević, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Bosnjak, Michael, Teovanović, Predrag, Petrović, Boban, Opačić, Goran, "Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis" in Personality and Individual Differences, 143 (2019):155-164,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.009 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mentus, Tatjana
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1004
AB  - Faking on Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality inventory was incited by the context simulation instructions: fake good (S2), fake bad (S3) and be honest (S1). Simultaneously, under instruction S1, the scores of respondents were measured on the Amoral facets of Self-concept scale (GSC), the Balanced social desirability scale (BIDR) and the cognitive tests of the fluid (IT2, ALF and RM) and the crystallized (AL4, vocabulary and GSN) intelligence, supposed (Morality), or known from the literature, as possible faking determinants. The score differences on Amoral dimension facets were calculated for S2 and for S3 situations using as a baseline the score in S1 situation. The score differences between S3 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FB) were found to be larger than the ones between S2 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FG). This result indicated that a) Amoral is susceptible to faking, and b) in S3, rather than in S2 situation, respondents displayed higher tendency of faking, or in other words, they incline to make worse rather than good presentation of themselves. The Projection facet of Amoral was most sensitive toward faking. These differences are found to be correlated with the Morality dimension of Self- concept scale and the fluid intelligence factor, but not with the dimensions of Social desirability scale in both situation for almost all faking scores on Amoral facets. Only Brutality was not related to the Morality, and Viciousness was not related to the Gf. This indicated that the dimension Morality of the Self-concept scale is far more correlated with the Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality scale than with the Social desirability scale.
PB  - Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Psihologija
T1  - The investigation of the manipulation with scores on amoral dimension of the HEDONICA inventory
EP  - 148
IS  - 2
SP  - 129
VL  - 49
DO  - 10.2298/PSI1602129M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Mentus, Tatjana and Opačić, Goran and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Faking on Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality inventory was incited by the context simulation instructions: fake good (S2), fake bad (S3) and be honest (S1). Simultaneously, under instruction S1, the scores of respondents were measured on the Amoral facets of Self-concept scale (GSC), the Balanced social desirability scale (BIDR) and the cognitive tests of the fluid (IT2, ALF and RM) and the crystallized (AL4, vocabulary and GSN) intelligence, supposed (Morality), or known from the literature, as possible faking determinants. The score differences on Amoral dimension facets were calculated for S2 and for S3 situations using as a baseline the score in S1 situation. The score differences between S3 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FB) were found to be larger than the ones between S2 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FG). This result indicated that a) Amoral is susceptible to faking, and b) in S3, rather than in S2 situation, respondents displayed higher tendency of faking, or in other words, they incline to make worse rather than good presentation of themselves. The Projection facet of Amoral was most sensitive toward faking. These differences are found to be correlated with the Morality dimension of Self- concept scale and the fluid intelligence factor, but not with the dimensions of Social desirability scale in both situation for almost all faking scores on Amoral facets. Only Brutality was not related to the Morality, and Viciousness was not related to the Gf. This indicated that the dimension Morality of the Self-concept scale is far more correlated with the Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality scale than with the Social desirability scale.",
publisher = "Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Psihologija",
title = "The investigation of the manipulation with scores on amoral dimension of the HEDONICA inventory",
pages = "148-129",
number = "2",
volume = "49",
doi = "10.2298/PSI1602129M"
}

Mentus, T., Opačić, G.,& Knežević, G.. (2016). The investigation of the manipulation with scores on amoral dimension of the HEDONICA inventory. in Psihologija
Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd., 49(2), 129-148.
https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1602129M

Mentus T, Opačić G, Knežević G. The investigation of the manipulation with scores on amoral dimension of the HEDONICA inventory. in Psihologija. 2016;49(2):129-148.
doi:10.2298/PSI1602129M .

Mentus, Tatjana, Opačić, Goran, Knežević, Goran, "The investigation of the manipulation with scores on amoral dimension of the HEDONICA inventory" in Psihologija, 49, no. 2 (2016):129-148,
https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1602129M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Bosnjak, Michael
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Petrović, Boban
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Bodroža, Bojana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/980
AB  - Relying on a recent re-conceptualization of psychosis proneness as a personality trait, its relations with the Big Five traits were investigated in a meta-analytic study. This re-conceptualized trait - named Disintegration - is articulated as a broad, hierarchically organized, nine-faceted behavioral disposition. Disintegration is postulated to be a basic personality trait distinct from the Big Five traits. In accordance with this conceptualization, all the articles considered for this meta-analysis carry information on the relationship between Disintegration-like phenomena (referring to various aspects of symptomatology with prefix 'schizo-', both at the clinical and the sub-clinical level), and at least one Big Five trait. The benchmark for assuming distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .40, based on the meta-analytically derived correlations found among the Big Five traits. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and N, E, O, A, and C, respectively: .24, -.27, 0, -.19, and -13. The differences in true correlations between the studies were substantial for each coefficient Three variables were found to moderate Disintegration-personality correlations. The finding about the distinctness of Disintegration from other personality traits can have repercussions on the taxonomy of traits.
PB  - Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
T2  - Personality and Individual Differences
T1  - Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence
EP  - 222
SP  - 214
VL  - 95
DO  - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Knežević, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Bosnjak, Michael and Purić, Danka and Petrović, Boban and Teovanović, Predrag and Opačić, Goran and Bodroža, Bojana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Relying on a recent re-conceptualization of psychosis proneness as a personality trait, its relations with the Big Five traits were investigated in a meta-analytic study. This re-conceptualized trait - named Disintegration - is articulated as a broad, hierarchically organized, nine-faceted behavioral disposition. Disintegration is postulated to be a basic personality trait distinct from the Big Five traits. In accordance with this conceptualization, all the articles considered for this meta-analysis carry information on the relationship between Disintegration-like phenomena (referring to various aspects of symptomatology with prefix 'schizo-', both at the clinical and the sub-clinical level), and at least one Big Five trait. The benchmark for assuming distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .40, based on the meta-analytically derived correlations found among the Big Five traits. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and N, E, O, A, and C, respectively: .24, -.27, 0, -.19, and -13. The differences in true correlations between the studies were substantial for each coefficient Three variables were found to moderate Disintegration-personality correlations. The finding about the distinctness of Disintegration from other personality traits can have repercussions on the taxonomy of traits.",
publisher = "Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
title = "Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence",
pages = "222-214",
volume = "95",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044"
}

Knežević, G., Lazarević, L. B., Bosnjak, M., Purić, D., Petrović, B., Teovanović, P., Opačić, G.,& Bodroža, B.. (2016). Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. in Personality and Individual Differences
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford., 95, 214-222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044

Knežević G, Lazarević LB, Bosnjak M, Purić D, Petrović B, Teovanović P, Opačić G, Bodroža B. Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. in Personality and Individual Differences. 2016;95:214-222.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044 .

Knežević, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Bosnjak, Michael, Purić, Danka, Petrović, Boban, Teovanović, Predrag, Opačić, Goran, Bodroža, Bojana, "Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence" in Personality and Individual Differences, 95 (2016):214-222,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.044 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Bosnjak, Michael
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Boban
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Bodroža, Bojana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/989
AB  - This meta-analytic study investigates the relations between Disintegration-like phenomena (i.e., various aspects of symptomatology with the prefix "schizo-," both at the clinical and the subclinical level) and the traits of the Psychobiological Model of Personality (PBMP). The empirically based benchmark for assuming the distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .30. The sample included 26 manuscripts with 30 studies and 424 effect sizes. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and Harm Avoidance, Novelty Seeking, Reward Dependence, Persistence, Self-Directedness, Cooperativeness, and Self-Transcendence: .23, .04, -.15, -.02, -.23, -.16, and .17, respectively. Two variables were found to moderate the Disintegration-Self-Transcendence correlation. Despite the theoretical expectation and some empirical evidence that Self-Transcendence (and other character traits) should capture variations in Disintegration-like phenomena, our results suggest that schizo-type phenomena are not adequately covered by the PBMP.
PB  - Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen
T2  - Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
T1  - Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis
EP  - 215
IS  - 3
SP  - 204
VL  - 224
DO  - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000254
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Bosnjak, Michael and Knežević, Goran and Petrović, Boban and Purić, Danka and Teovanović, Predrag and Opačić, Goran and Bodroža, Bojana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "This meta-analytic study investigates the relations between Disintegration-like phenomena (i.e., various aspects of symptomatology with the prefix "schizo-," both at the clinical and the subclinical level) and the traits of the Psychobiological Model of Personality (PBMP). The empirically based benchmark for assuming the distinctness of the trait Disintegration was .30. The sample included 26 manuscripts with 30 studies and 424 effect sizes. By computing inverse sampling variance weighted mean correlation coefficients under a random-effects assumption, the following associations were found between Disintegration and Harm Avoidance, Novelty Seeking, Reward Dependence, Persistence, Self-Directedness, Cooperativeness, and Self-Transcendence: .23, .04, -.15, -.02, -.23, -.16, and .17, respectively. Two variables were found to moderate the Disintegration-Self-Transcendence correlation. Despite the theoretical expectation and some empirical evidence that Self-Transcendence (and other character traits) should capture variations in Disintegration-like phenomena, our results suggest that schizo-type phenomena are not adequately covered by the PBMP.",
publisher = "Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen",
journal = "Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology",
title = "Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis",
pages = "215-204",
number = "3",
volume = "224",
doi = "10.1027/2151-2604/a000254"
}

Lazarević, L. B., Bosnjak, M., Knežević, G., Petrović, B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Opačić, G.,& Bodroža, B.. (2016). Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis. in Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Gottingen., 224(3), 204-215.
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000254

Lazarević LB, Bosnjak M, Knežević G, Petrović B, Purić D, Teovanović P, Opačić G, Bodroža B. Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis. in Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology. 2016;224(3):204-215.
doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000254 .

Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Bosnjak, Michael, Knežević, Goran, Petrović, Boban, Purić, Danka, Teovanović, Predrag, Opačić, Goran, Bodroža, Bojana, "Disintegration as an Additional Trait in the Psychobiological Model of Personality Assessing Discriminant Validity via Meta-Analysis" in Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 224, no. 3 (2016):204-215,
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000254 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Stankov, Lazar
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/923
AB  - In this paper we seek to gain an improved understanding of the structure of cognitive biases and their relationship with measures of intelligence and relevant non-cognitive constructs. We report on the outcomes of a study based on a heterogeneous set of seven cognitive biases - anchoring effect, belief bias, overconfidence bias, hindsight bias, base rate neglect, outcome bias and sunk cost effect. New scales for the assessment of these biases were administered to 243 undergraduate students along with measures of fluid (Gf) and crystallized (Gc) intelligence, a Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), Openness/Intellect (O/I) scale and Need for Cognition (NFC) scale. The expected experimental results were confirmed - i.e., each normatively irrelevant variable significantly influenced participants' responses. Also, with the exception of hindsight bias, all cognitive biases showed satisfactory reliability estimates (alpha s > .70). However, correlations among the cognitive bias measures were low (rs  lt  .20). Although exploratory factor analysis produced two factors, their robustness was doubtful. Cognitive bias measures were also relatively independent (rs  lt  .25) from the Gf, Gc, CRT, O/I and NFC and they define separate latent factors. This pattern of results suggests that a major part of the reliable variance of cognitive bias tasks is unique, and implies that a one-factor model of rational behavior is not plausible.
PB  - Elsevier Science Inc, New York
T2  - Intelligence
T1  - Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality
EP  - 86
SP  - 75
VL  - 50
DO  - 10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag and Knežević, Goran and Stankov, Lazar",
year = "2015",
abstract = "In this paper we seek to gain an improved understanding of the structure of cognitive biases and their relationship with measures of intelligence and relevant non-cognitive constructs. We report on the outcomes of a study based on a heterogeneous set of seven cognitive biases - anchoring effect, belief bias, overconfidence bias, hindsight bias, base rate neglect, outcome bias and sunk cost effect. New scales for the assessment of these biases were administered to 243 undergraduate students along with measures of fluid (Gf) and crystallized (Gc) intelligence, a Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), Openness/Intellect (O/I) scale and Need for Cognition (NFC) scale. The expected experimental results were confirmed - i.e., each normatively irrelevant variable significantly influenced participants' responses. Also, with the exception of hindsight bias, all cognitive biases showed satisfactory reliability estimates (alpha s > .70). However, correlations among the cognitive bias measures were low (rs  lt  .20). Although exploratory factor analysis produced two factors, their robustness was doubtful. Cognitive bias measures were also relatively independent (rs  lt  .25) from the Gf, Gc, CRT, O/I and NFC and they define separate latent factors. This pattern of results suggests that a major part of the reliable variance of cognitive bias tasks is unique, and implies that a one-factor model of rational behavior is not plausible.",
publisher = "Elsevier Science Inc, New York",
journal = "Intelligence",
title = "Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality",
pages = "86-75",
volume = "50",
doi = "10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008"
}

Teovanović, P., Knežević, G.,& Stankov, L.. (2015). Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality. in Intelligence
Elsevier Science Inc, New York., 50, 75-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008

Teovanović P, Knežević G, Stankov L. Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality. in Intelligence. 2015;50:75-86.
doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008 .

Teovanović, Predrag, Knežević, Goran, Stankov, Lazar, "Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality" in Intelligence, 50 (2015):75-86,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Korać, Hana
AU  - Knežević, Goran
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rfasper.fasper.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4493
AB  - U nastojanju da istraže strukturu psihopatije i razviju instrumente koji bi
bili upotrebljivi u kliničkom i istraživačkom kontekstu, referentni autori su
produkovali značajan broj ček-lista, dijagnostičkih kriterijuma i upitnika.
Naše istraživanje je imalo za cilj da unakrsno validira dve savremene operacionalizacije
unutrašnjih dispozicija antisocijalnog ponašanja. Paulus i
Vilijams (2002) smatraju da se „crna trijada“ ličnosti može opisati putem
tri povezana, ali nezavisna konstrukta: makijavelizma (merenog putem
MACH-IV skale), psihopatije (SRP) i narcisizma (NPI). Ekstremni skorovi
na pomenutim instrumentima, tvrde autori, odlikuju socijalno malevolentnu
ličnost. Sa druge strane, skala amoralnosti Kneževića i Radovića (1998)
mapira dispozicije koje se nalaze u osnovi amoralnog ponašanja. Konstrukt
amorala je strukturalno prikazan putem devet dimenzija, koje se grupišu
oko tri faktora drugog reda.
Bliskost dve operacionalizacije najpre je proveravana pomoću Pirsonovih
koeficijenata linearne korelacije. Nalazi svedoče o povezanosti (1) makijavelizma
sa (MACH-IV) sa dimenzijama resentimana (r=.44, p<.01), destruktivnosti
(r=.40, p<.01) i sadizma (r=.30, p<.01); (2) narcisizma (NPI) sa resentimanom
(r=.47, p<.01) i makijavelizmom (r=.42, p<.01); (3) psihopatije
sa resentimanom, niskom kontrolom i destruktivnošću (.39, .38., .35, datim
redosledom; p<.01). Rezultati kanoničke korelacione analize sugerišu da
„crna trijada“ ne uključuje one apsekte dispozicija za amoralno ponašanje
koji se odnose na agresivnost iz brutalnosti, a koji su predstavljeni u modelu
amorala. Drugim rečima, čini se da je Kneževićev model komprehenzivniji,
odnosno da obuhvata širi raspon ličnosnih dispozicija za devijantna ponašanja.
AB  - In an effort to explore the structure of psychopathy and to develop
instruments which could be applied in both clinical and scientific context, a
significant number of check-lists, diagnostic criterias and questionnaires have
been developed by relevant authors (Hare, 1985, 1991, 1997, 2003; Edens et al.,
2006; Coid & Yang, 2008). The aim of this research was to cross-validate two
contemporary operationalizations of internal dispositions of antisocial behavior.
Paulhus and Williams (2002) assumed that the „dark triad“ of personality
can be described through three combined, but independent constructs:
Machiavellianism (measured by MACH-IV scale), Psychopathy (SRP) and
Narcissism (NPI). Extreme scores on above mentioned instruments characterize
a socially malevolent personality. In addition, a scale of amorality (Knezevic and
Radovic, 2003), maps dispositions which are in the core of amoral behavior. The
construct of amorality is structurally presented through nine dimensions which
are grouped around three second order factors.
The overlapping of the two operationalizations is firstly checked by Pearson
product-moment correlation coefficients. Results suggest connection of: (1)
Machiavellianism (MACH-IV) with dimensions of resentment (r=.44, p<.01),
destructiveness (r=.40, p<.01) and sadism (r=.30, p<.01); (2) narcissism (NPI) with
resentment (r=.47, p<.01) and machiavellianism (r=.42, p<.01); (3) psychopathy
with resentment, low control and destructiveness (.39, .38., .35, respectively;
p<.01). Results of canonic correlation and multiple regression analyses suggest that
„dark triad“ does not include those aspects of dispositions for amoral behavior
which regard aggression driven from brutality and which is proposed in the
model of amorality. In the other words, Knezevic’s model is more comprehensive
in the matter that it involves a wider range of personality dispositions for deviant
behavior.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
C3  - Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I  “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010
T1  - Unakrsna validacija skale amoralnosti i skala crne trijade
T1  - Cross-validation of amorality scale and dark triad scales
EP  - 604
SP  - 589
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4493
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag and Korać, Hana and Knežević, Goran",
year = "2010",
abstract = "U nastojanju da istraže strukturu psihopatije i razviju instrumente koji bi
bili upotrebljivi u kliničkom i istraživačkom kontekstu, referentni autori su
produkovali značajan broj ček-lista, dijagnostičkih kriterijuma i upitnika.
Naše istraživanje je imalo za cilj da unakrsno validira dve savremene operacionalizacije
unutrašnjih dispozicija antisocijalnog ponašanja. Paulus i
Vilijams (2002) smatraju da se „crna trijada“ ličnosti može opisati putem
tri povezana, ali nezavisna konstrukta: makijavelizma (merenog putem
MACH-IV skale), psihopatije (SRP) i narcisizma (NPI). Ekstremni skorovi
na pomenutim instrumentima, tvrde autori, odlikuju socijalno malevolentnu
ličnost. Sa druge strane, skala amoralnosti Kneževića i Radovića (1998)
mapira dispozicije koje se nalaze u osnovi amoralnog ponašanja. Konstrukt
amorala je strukturalno prikazan putem devet dimenzija, koje se grupišu
oko tri faktora drugog reda.
Bliskost dve operacionalizacije najpre je proveravana pomoću Pirsonovih
koeficijenata linearne korelacije. Nalazi svedoče o povezanosti (1) makijavelizma
sa (MACH-IV) sa dimenzijama resentimana (r=.44, p<.01), destruktivnosti
(r=.40, p<.01) i sadizma (r=.30, p<.01); (2) narcisizma (NPI) sa resentimanom
(r=.47, p<.01) i makijavelizmom (r=.42, p<.01); (3) psihopatije
sa resentimanom, niskom kontrolom i destruktivnošću (.39, .38., .35, datim
redosledom; p<.01). Rezultati kanoničke korelacione analize sugerišu da
„crna trijada“ ne uključuje one apsekte dispozicija za amoralno ponašanje
koji se odnose na agresivnost iz brutalnosti, a koji su predstavljeni u modelu
amorala. Drugim rečima, čini se da je Kneževićev model komprehenzivniji,
odnosno da obuhvata širi raspon ličnosnih dispozicija za devijantna ponašanja., In an effort to explore the structure of psychopathy and to develop
instruments which could be applied in both clinical and scientific context, a
significant number of check-lists, diagnostic criterias and questionnaires have
been developed by relevant authors (Hare, 1985, 1991, 1997, 2003; Edens et al.,
2006; Coid & Yang, 2008). The aim of this research was to cross-validate two
contemporary operationalizations of internal dispositions of antisocial behavior.
Paulhus and Williams (2002) assumed that the „dark triad“ of personality
can be described through three combined, but independent constructs:
Machiavellianism (measured by MACH-IV scale), Psychopathy (SRP) and
Narcissism (NPI). Extreme scores on above mentioned instruments characterize
a socially malevolent personality. In addition, a scale of amorality (Knezevic and
Radovic, 2003), maps dispositions which are in the core of amoral behavior. The
construct of amorality is structurally presented through nine dimensions which
are grouped around three second order factors.
The overlapping of the two operationalizations is firstly checked by Pearson
product-moment correlation coefficients. Results suggest connection of: (1)
Machiavellianism (MACH-IV) with dimensions of resentment (r=.44, p<.01),
destructiveness (r=.40, p<.01) and sadism (r=.30, p<.01); (2) narcissism (NPI) with
resentment (r=.47, p<.01) and machiavellianism (r=.42, p<.01); (3) psychopathy
with resentment, low control and destructiveness (.39, .38., .35, respectively;
p<.01). Results of canonic correlation and multiple regression analyses suggest that
„dark triad“ does not include those aspects of dispositions for amoral behavior
which regard aggression driven from brutality and which is proposed in the
model of amorality. In the other words, Knezevic’s model is more comprehensive
in the matter that it involves a wider range of personality dispositions for deviant
behavior.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation",
journal = "Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I  “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010",
title = "Unakrsna validacija skale amoralnosti i skala crne trijade, Cross-validation of amorality scale and dark triad scales",
pages = "604-589",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4493"
}

Teovanović, P., Korać, H.,& Knežević, G.. (2010). Unakrsna validacija skale amoralnosti i skala crne trijade. in Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I  “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010
Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju/ University of Belgrade – Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation., 589-604.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4493

Teovanović P, Korać H, Knežević G. Unakrsna validacija skale amoralnosti i skala crne trijade. in Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I  “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010. 2010;:589-604.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4493 .

Teovanović, Predrag, Korać, Hana, Knežević, Goran, "Unakrsna validacija skale amoralnosti i skala crne trijade" in Zbornik radova - „ Smetnje i poremećaji: fenomenologija, prevencija i tretman deo II / Disabilities and Disorders: Phenomenology, Prevention and Treatment Part I I  “,Beograd / Belgrade 2010 (2010):589-604,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfasper_4493 .